[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904 |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:29:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 07/09/2020 04:38, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 04:47, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 67a7bfe560a1bba59efab085cb3430f45176d382:
>>>
>>> Merge remote-tracking branch
>>> 'remotes/huth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2020-09-03' into staging (2020-09-03
>>> 16:58:25 +0100)
>>>
>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://github.com/dgibson/qemu.git tags/ppc-for-5.2-20200904
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to b172606ecf29a140073f7787251a9d70ecb53b6e:
>>>
>>> spapr_numa: move NVLink2 associativity handling to spapr_numa.c
>>> (2020-09-04 13:40:09 +1000)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ppc patch queue 2020-09-04
>>>
>>> Next pull request for qemu-5.2. The biggest thing here is the
>>> generalization of ARM's start-powered-off machine property to all
>>> targets. This can fix a number of odd little edge cases where KVM
>>> could run vcpus before they were properly initialized. This does
>>> include changes to a number of files that aren't normally in my
>>> purview. There are suitable Acked-by lines and Peter requested this
>>> come in via my tree, since the most pressing requirement for it is in
>>> pseries machines with the POWER secure virtual machine facility.
>>>
>>> In addition we have:
>>> * The start of Daniel Barboza's rework and clean up of pseries
>>> machine NUMA handling
>>> * Correction to behaviour of the nvdimm= generic machine property on
>>> pseries
>>> * An optimization to the allocation of XIVE interrupts on KVM
>>> * Some fixes for confused behaviour with kernel_irqchip when both
>>> XICS and XIVE are in play
>>> * Add HIOMAP comamnd to pnv flash
>>> * Properly advertise the fact that spapr_vscsi doesn't handle
>>> hotplugged disks
>>> * Some assorted minor enhancements
>>
>> Hi -- this fails to build for Windows:
>>
>> ../../hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c: In function 'spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt':
>> ../../hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c:77:5: error: unknown type name 'uint'
>> uint vcpu_assoc_size = NUMA_ASSOC_SIZE + 1;
>> ^
>
> Huh, that's weird. My testing run was less thorough than I'd usually
> do, because so many tests were broken on the master branch, but I was
> pretty sure I did do successful mingw builds.
>
>> That should probably be using one of the standard C types.
>
> Done.
>
>> The 'check-tcg' tests for the linux-user static build also
>> failed on an s390x test:
>>
>> CHECK debian-s390x-cross
>> BUILD s390x-linux-user guest-tests with docker qemu/debian-s390x-cross
>> RUN tests for s390x
>> TEST threadcount on s390x
>> Unhandled trap: 0x10003
This is EXCP_HALTED (include/exec/cpu-all.h)
The message error comes from cpu_loop() in linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c.
The trap can only come from accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
679 int cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
680 {
...
688 if (cpu_handle_halt(cpu)) {
689 return EXCP_HALTED;
690 }
and
428 static inline bool cpu_handle_halt(CPUState *cpu)
429 {
430 if (cpu->halted) {
...
441 if (!cpu_has_work(cpu)) {
442 return true;
443 }
and
58 static bool s390_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
59 {
60 S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
61
62 /* STOPPED cpus can never wake up */
63 if (s390_cpu_get_state(cpu) != S390_CPU_STATE_LOAD &&
64 s390_cpu_get_state(cpu) != S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING) {
65 return false;
66 }
67
68 if (!(cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD)) {
69 return false;
70 }
71
72 return s390_cpu_has_int(cpu);
73 }
and in target/s390x/cpu.h:
772 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
773 unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu);
774 #else
775 static inline unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state,
S390CPU *cpu)
776 {
777 return 0;
778 }
779 #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
780 static inline uint8_t s390_cpu_get_state(S390CPU *cpu)
781 {
782 return cpu->env.cpu_state;
783 }
As cpu_state is never set, perhaps in case of linux-user it should
always return S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING?
Something like:
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 035427521cec..8a8628fcdcc6 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -771,16 +771,20 @@ int s390_assign_subch_ioeventfd(EventNotifier
*notifier, uint32_t sch_id,
int vq, bool assign);
#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu);
+static inline uint8_t s390_cpu_get_state(S390CPU *cpu)
+{
+ return cpu->env.cpu_state;
+}
#else
static inline unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state,
S390CPU *cpu)
{
return 0;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
static inline uint8_t s390_cpu_get_state(S390CPU *cpu)
{
- return cpu->env.cpu_state;
+ return S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
Thanks,
Laurent
>> PSW=mask 0000000180000000 addr 00000000010004f0 cc 00
>> R00=0000000000000000 R01=0000000000000000 R02=0000000000000000
>> R03=0000000000000000
>> R04=0000000000000000 R05=0000000000000000 R06=0000000000000000
>> R07=0000000000000000
>> R08=0000000000000000 R09=0000000000000000 R10=0000000000000000
>> R11=0000000000000000
>> R12=0000000000000000 R13=0000000000000000 R14=0000000000000000
>> R15=00000040008006c0
>>
>> ../Makefile.target:153: recipe for target 'run-threadcount' failed
>> make[2]: *** [run-threadcount] Error 1
>
> Bother. I did see that failure on Travis, but assumed it was a false
> positive because there were so many failures on master there.
>
- [PULL 23/30] hw/ppc/ppc4xx_pci: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of magic value, (continued)
- [PULL 23/30] hw/ppc/ppc4xx_pci: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of magic value, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 24/30] hw/ppc/ppc4xx_pci: Replace pointless warning by assert(), David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 25/30] ppc: introducing spapr_numa.c NUMA code helper, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 26/30] ppc/spapr_nvdimm: turn spapr_dt_nvdimm() static, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 30/30] spapr_numa: move NVLink2 associativity handling to spapr_numa.c, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 29/30] spapr, spapr_numa: move lookup-arrays handling to spapr_numa.c, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 28/30] spapr, spapr_numa: handle vcpu ibm,associativity, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- [PULL 27/30] spapr: introduce SpaprMachineState::numa_assoc_array, David Gibson, 2020/09/03
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Peter Maydell, 2020/09/06
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, David Gibson, 2020/09/06
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904,
Laurent Vivier <=
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Laurent Vivier, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Cornelia Huck, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Laurent Vivier, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Laurent Vivier, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, David Gibson, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Cornelia Huck, 2020/09/08
- Re: [PULL 00/30] ppc-for-5.2 queue 20200904, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2020/09/08