qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] spapr_hcall: h_home_node_associativity now reads numa


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] spapr_hcall: h_home_node_associativity now reads numa_assoc_array
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:46:45 +1000

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:56:45AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> home_node_associativity reply now uses the associativity
> values for tcpu->node_id provided by numa_assoc_array.
> 
> This will avoid further changes in this code when numa_assoc_array
> changes values, but it won't be enough to prevent further changes
> if (falar aqui q se mudar o tamanho do array tem q mexer nessa
> funcao tambem, falar q a macro associativity() deixa a automacao
> de tudo mto unreadable)

Uh.. I'm guessing that was a note to yourself you intended to
translate before publishing?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> index c1d01228c6..2ec30efdcb 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -1878,9 +1878,13 @@ static target_ulong 
> h_home_node_associativity(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                                target_ulong opcode,
>                                                target_ulong *args)

You could move this function to spapr_numa.c as well (the name's a bit
misleading, but spapr_hcall.c isn't really intended to hold *all*
hcall implementations, just the ones that don't have somewhere better
to live).

>  {
> +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
>      target_ulong flags = args[0];
>      target_ulong procno = args[1];
>      PowerPCCPU *tcpu;
> +    uint32_t assoc_domain1;
> +    uint32_t assoc_domain2;
> +    uint32_t assoc_domain3;
>      int idx;
>  
>      /* only support procno from H_REGISTER_VPA */
> @@ -1893,13 +1897,21 @@ static target_ulong 
> h_home_node_associativity(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>          return H_P2;
>      }
>  
> +    /*
> +     * Index 0 is the ibm,associativity size of the node,
> +     * which isn't relevant here.
> +     */
> +    assoc_domain1 = smc->numa_assoc_array[tcpu->node_id][1];
> +    assoc_domain2 = smc->numa_assoc_array[tcpu->node_id][2];
> +    assoc_domain3 = smc->numa_assoc_array[tcpu->node_id][3];

Using all these temporaries is a little ugly.  Maybe do something like:
        uint32_t *assoc = smc->numa_assoc_array[tcpu->node_id];

Then just use assoc[1], assoc[2] etc. below.

> +
>      /* sequence is the same as in the "ibm,associativity" property */
>  
>      idx = 0;
>  #define ASSOCIATIVITY(a, b) (((uint64_t)(a) << 32) | \
>                               ((uint64_t)(b) & 0xffffffff))
> -    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(0, 0);
> -    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(0, tcpu->node_id);
> +    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(assoc_domain1, assoc_domain2);
> +    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(assoc_domain3, tcpu->node_id);
>      args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(procno, -1);
>      for ( ; idx < 6; idx++) {
>          args[idx] = -1;

Better yet would be to make this handle an arbitrary length of assoc
array, further isolating this from the specifics of how we construct
the arrays.  Ideally, you'd call a common path with
spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt() to get the assoc array for a cpu, then here
just translate it into the in-register format the hcall expects.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]