qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] hw: add 5.2 machine types and 5.1 compat options


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] hw: add 5.2 machine types and 5.1 compat options
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:27:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

On 8/19/20 4:38 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/19/20 16:12, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:33:43 +0100
>>> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> arm, i386, ppc, and s390x have versioned machine types and associated
>>>> compatibility options. Introduce new ones now that QEMU 5.1 has been
>>>> released.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  include/hw/boards.h        |  3 +++
>>>>  include/hw/i386/pc.h       |  3 +++
>>>>  hw/arm/virt.c              |  9 ++++++++-
>>>>  hw/core/machine.c          |  4 ++++
>>>>  hw/i386/pc.c               |  4 ++++
>>>>  hw/i386/pc_piix.c          | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>  hw/i386/pc_q35.c           | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c             | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>  9 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200728094645.272149-1-cohuck@redhat.com/
>>> is already out there :)
>>
>> You're too quick! :)
>>
>> Next time I'll write a script and monitor qemu.git for the release tag
>> so I can be first!!!!!!111
> 
> You're joking, but a template patch or some other automatism that opens
> the next development tree *BY* introducing new machine types would be
> nothing to frown at.
> 
> Another option would be for Peter to delay opening up the next
> development tree until he could immediately merge a patch with the new
> machine types (posted by whoever, near the end of the HFF or something).

Or this can be the "Open the tree for development" first patch :)

> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]