qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 22/34] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprI


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/34] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:40:15 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:13:55AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> @@ -527,6 +471,30 @@ static int spapr_irq_check(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
> >> Error **errp)
> >>  /*
> >>   * sPAPR IRQ frontend routines for devices
> >>   */
> >> +#define ALL_INTCS(spapr_) \
> >> +    { SPAPR_INTC((spapr_)->ics), SPAPR_INTC((spapr_)->xive), }
> > 
> > I would have expected this array to be under the machine.
> > 
> >> +int spapr_irq_cpu_intc_create(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> >> +                              PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> >> +{
> >> +    SpaprInterruptController *intcs[] = ALL_INTCS(spapr);
> >> +    int i;
> >> +    int rc;
> >> +
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intcs); i++) {
> > 
> > but it would have been difficult to use ARRAY_SIZE. OK then.
> > 
> >> +        SpaprInterruptController *intc = intcs[i];
> >> +        if (intc) {
> > 
> > Is that test needed ? 
> 
> I understand now : spapr->ics and spapr->xive can be NULL. 
> 
> I think using a list would be better.

Uh.. a list in what sense?

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]