qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 23/33] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt control


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/33] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:16:22 +0200

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:18 +1000
David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:

> spapr now has the mechanism of constructing both XICS and XIVE instances of
> the SpaprInterruptController interface.  However, only one of the interrupt
> controllers will actually be active at any given time, depending on feature
> negotiation with the guest.  This is handled in the current code via
> spapr_irq_current() which checks the OV5 vector from feature negotiation to
> determine the current backend.
> 
> Determining the active controller at the point we need it like this
> can be pretty confusing, because it makes it very non obvious at what
> points the active controller can change.  This can make it difficult
> to reason about the code and where a change of active controller could
> appear in sequence with other events.
> 
> Make this mechanism more explicit by adding an 'active_intc' pointer
> and an explicit spapr_irq_update_active_intc() function to update it
> from the CAS state.  We also add hooks on the intc backend which will
> get called when it is activated or deactivated.
> 
> For now we just introduce the switch and hooks, later patches will
> actually start using them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>

>  hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c         | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h     |  5 ++--
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h |  5 ++++
>  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index ea44378d8c..dfa875b7cd 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ qemu_irq spapr_qirq(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq)
>  
>  int spapr_irq_post_load(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int version_id)
>  {
> +    spapr_irq_update_active_intc(spapr);
>      return spapr->irq->post_load(spapr, version_id);
>  }
>  
> @@ -600,6 +601,8 @@ void spapr_irq_reset(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error 
> **errp)
>  {
>      assert(!spapr->irq_map || bitmap_empty(spapr->irq_map, 
> spapr->irq_map_nr));
>  
> +    spapr_irq_update_active_intc(spapr);
> +
>      if (spapr->irq->reset) {
>          spapr->irq->reset(spapr, errp);
>      }
> @@ -626,6 +629,54 @@ int spapr_irq_get_phandle(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void 
> *fdt, Error **errp)
>      return phandle;
>  }
>  
> +static void set_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                            SpaprInterruptController *new_intc)
> +{
> +    SpaprInterruptControllerClass *sicc;
> +
> +    assert(new_intc);
> +
> +    if (new_intc == spapr->active_intc) {
> +        /* Nothing to do */
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (spapr->active_intc) {
> +        sicc = SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(spapr->active_intc);
> +        if (sicc->deactivate) {
> +            sicc->deactivate(spapr->active_intc);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    sicc = SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(new_intc);
> +    if (sicc->activate) {
> +        sicc->activate(new_intc, &error_fatal);
> +    }
> +
> +    spapr->active_intc = new_intc;
> +}
> +
> +void spapr_irq_update_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
> +{
> +    SpaprInterruptController *new_intc;
> +
> +    if (!spapr->ics) {
> +        /*
> +         * XXX before we run CAS, ov5_cas is initialized empty, which
> +         * indicates XICS, even if we have ic-mode=xive.  TODO: clean
> +         * up the CAS path so that we have a clearer way of handling
> +         * this.
> +         */
> +        new_intc = SPAPR_INTC(spapr->xive);
> +    } else if (spapr_ovec_test(spapr->ov5_cas, OV5_XIVE_EXPLOIT)) {
> +        new_intc = SPAPR_INTC(spapr->xive);
> +    } else {
> +        new_intc = SPAPR_INTC(spapr->ics);
> +    }
> +
> +    set_active_intc(spapr, new_intc);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * XICS legacy routines - to deprecate one day
>   */
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index cbd1a4c9f3..763da757f0 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
>      struct SpaprVioBus *vio_bus;
>      QLIST_HEAD(, SpaprPhbState) phbs;
>      struct SpaprNvram *nvram;
> -    ICSState *ics;
>      SpaprRtcState rtc;
>  
>      SpaprResizeHpt resize_hpt;
> @@ -195,9 +194,11 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
>  
>      int32_t irq_map_nr;
>      unsigned long *irq_map;
> -    SpaprXive  *xive;
>      SpaprIrq *irq;
>      qemu_irq *qirqs;
> +    SpaprInterruptController *active_intc;
> +    ICSState *ics;
> +    SpaprXive *xive;
>  
>      bool cmd_line_caps[SPAPR_CAP_NUM];
>      SpaprCapabilities def, eff, mig;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index 616086f9bb..3102d152b2 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ typedef struct SpaprInterruptController 
> SpaprInterruptController;
>  typedef struct SpaprInterruptControllerClass {
>      InterfaceClass parent;
>  
> +    void (*activate)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, Error **errp);
> +    void (*deactivate)(SpaprInterruptController *intc);
> +
>      /*
>       * These methods will typically be called on all intcs, active and
>       * inactive
> @@ -55,6 +58,8 @@ typedef struct SpaprInterruptControllerClass {
>      void (*free_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq);
>  } SpaprInterruptControllerClass;
>  
> +void spapr_irq_update_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr);
> +
>  void spapr_irq_print_info(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon);
>  void spapr_irq_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t nr_servers,
>                    void *fdt, uint32_t phandle);




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]