[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH for 3.1] spapr: Fix ibm, max-associativity-domains
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH for 3.1] spapr: Fix ibm, max-associativity-domains property number of nodes |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:48:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 |
On 19/11/2018 14:27, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:09:38 -0500
> Serhii Popovych <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Laurent Vivier reported off by one with maximum number of NUMA nodes
>> provided by qemu-kvm being less by one than required according to
>> description of "ibm,max-associativity-domains" property in LoPAPR.
>>
>> It appears that I incorrectly treated LoPAPR description of this
>> property assuming it provides last valid domain (NUMA node here)
>> instead of maximum number of domains.
>>
>> ### Before hot-add
>>
>> (qemu) info numa
>> 3 nodes
>> node 0 cpus: 0
>> node 0 size: 0 MB
>> node 0 plugged: 0 MB
>> node 1 cpus:
>> node 1 size: 1024 MB
>> node 1 plugged: 0 MB
>> node 2 cpus:
>> node 2 size: 0 MB
>> node 2 plugged: 0 MB
>>
>> $ numactl -H
>> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
>> node 0 cpus: 0
>> node 0 size: 0 MB
>> node 0 free: 0 MB
>> node 1 cpus:
>> node 1 size: 999 MB
>> node 1 free: 658 MB
>> node distances:
>> node 0 1
>> 0: 10 40
>> 1: 40 10
>>
>> ### Hot-add
>>
>> (qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=1G
>> (qemu) device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem0,node=2
>> (qemu) [ 87.704898] pseries-hotplug-mem: Attempting to hot-add 4 ...
>> <there is no "Initmem setup node 2 [mem 0xHEX-0xHEX]">
>> [ 87.705128] lpar: Attempting to resize HPT to shift 21
>> ... <HPT resize messages>
>>
>> ### After hot-add
>>
>> (qemu) info numa
>> 3 nodes
>> node 0 cpus: 0
>> node 0 size: 0 MB
>> node 0 plugged: 0 MB
>> node 1 cpus:
>> node 1 size: 1024 MB
>> node 1 plugged: 0 MB
>> node 2 cpus:
>> node 2 size: 1024 MB
>> node 2 plugged: 1024 MB
>>
>> $ numactl -H
>> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Still only two nodes (and memory hot-added to node 0 below)
>> node 0 cpus: 0
>> node 0 size: 1024 MB
>> node 0 free: 1021 MB
>> node 1 cpus:
>> node 1 size: 999 MB
>> node 1 free: 658 MB
>> node distances:
>> node 0 1
>> 0: 10 40
>> 1: 40 10
>>
>> After fix applied numactl(8) reports 3 nodes available and memory
>> plugged into node 2 as expected.
>>
>> Fixes: da9f80fbad21 ("spapr: Add ibm,max-associativity-domains property")
>> Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Serhii Popovych <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index 7afd1a1..843ae6c 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static void spapr_dt_rtas(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>> void *fdt)
>> cpu_to_be32(0),
>> cpu_to_be32(0),
>> cpu_to_be32(0),
>> - cpu_to_be32(nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes - 1 : 0),
>> + cpu_to_be32(nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 0),
>
> Maybe simply cpu_to_be32(nb_numa_nodes) ?
Or "cpu_to_be32(nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1)" ?
In spapr_populate_drconf_memory() we have this logic.
Thanks,
Laurent