qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] target/ppc/kvm: don't pass cpu to kvm_get_smm


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] target/ppc/kvm: don't pass cpu to kvm_get_smmu_info()
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:14:58 +0200

On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:56:58 +0200
Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 06/28/2018 12:14 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > In a future patch the machine code will need to retrieve the MMU
> > information from KVM during machine initialization before the CPUs
> > are created.
> > 
> > Actually, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO is a VM class ioctl, and thus, it only
> > needs the kvm_state global variable to be set. The fallback code only
> > needs informations from the machine's CPU model class.
> > 
> > So this patch basically drops the CPU argument to kvm_get_smmu_info()
> > and kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(). The kvm_state and current_machine
> > globals are used instead to reach out to KVM and CPU model details
> > respectively.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> 
> one question below,
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> C.
> 
> > ---
> >  target/ppc/kvm.c        |   37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h |    8 +++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > index 4df4ff6cbff2..9fae89ff8175 100644
> > --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > @@ -248,11 +248,12 @@ static int kvm_booke206_tlb_init(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> >  
> >  
> >  #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> > -static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > -                                       struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> > +static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> >  {
> > -    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> > -    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> > +    const PowerPCCPUClass *pcc;
> > +
> > +    assert(current_machine != NULL);  
> 
> can that ever happen ? 
> 

It shouldn't, hence the assert() rather than merely SEGV'ing below.

> > +    pcc = 
> > POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(current_machine->cpu_type));
> >  
> >      memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> >  
> > @@ -278,7 +279,7 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >       *   implements KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO and thus doesn't hit
> >       *   this fallback.
> >       */
> > -    if (kvmppc_is_pr(cs->kvm_state)) {
> > +    if (kvmppc_is_pr(kvm_state)) {
> >          /* No flags */
> >          info->flags = 0;
> >          info->slb_size = 64;
> > @@ -300,12 +301,12 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU 
> > *cpu,
> >          /* HV KVM has backing store size restrictions */
> >          info->flags = KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_REAL;
> >  
> > -        if (ppc_hash64_has(cpu, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)) {
> > +        if (hash64_opts_has(pcc->hash64_opts, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)) {
> >              info->flags |= KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS;
> >          }
> >  
> > -        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> > -            env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> > +        if (pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> > +            pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> >              info->slb_size = 32;
> >          } else {
> >              info->slb_size = 64;
> > @@ -319,8 +320,8 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >          i++;
> >  
> >          /* 64K on MMU 2.06 and later */
> > -        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> > -            env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> > +        if (pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> > +            pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> >              info->sps[i].page_shift = 16;
> >              info->sps[i].slb_enc = 0x110;
> >              info->sps[i].enc[0].page_shift = 16;
> > @@ -336,19 +337,18 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU 
> > *cpu,
> >      }
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void kvm_get_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info 
> > *info)
> > +static void kvm_get_smmu_info(struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> >  {
> > -    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> >      int ret;
> >  
> > -    if (kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO)) {
> > -        ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(cs->kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO, info);
> > +    if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO)) {
> > +        ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO, info);
> >          if (ret == 0) {
> >              return;
> >          }
> >      }
> >  
> > -    kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(cpu, info);
> > +    kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(info);
> >  }
> >  
> >  struct ppc_radix_page_info *kvm_get_radix_page_info(void)
> > @@ -408,14 +408,13 @@ target_ulong kvmppc_configure_v3_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >  
> >  bool kvmppc_hpt_needs_host_contiguous_pages(void)
> >  {
> > -    PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
> >      static struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info smmu_info;
> >  
> >      if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> >          return false;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info);
> > +    kvm_get_smmu_info(&smmu_info);
> >      return !!(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_REAL);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -429,7 +428,7 @@ void kvm_check_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> >          return;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info);
> > +    kvm_get_smmu_info(&smmu_info);
> >  
> >      if (ppc_hash64_has(cpu, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)
> >          && !(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS)) {
> > @@ -2168,7 +2167,7 @@ uint64_t kvmppc_rma_size(uint64_t current_size, 
> > unsigned int hash_shift)
> >  
> >      /* Find the largest hardware supported page size that's less than
> >       * or equal to the (logical) backing page size of guest RAM */
> > -    kvm_get_smmu_info(POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu), &info);
> > +    kvm_get_smmu_info(&info);
> >      rampagesize = qemu_getrampagesize();
> >      best_page_shift = 0;
> >  
> > diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> > index f11efc9cbc1f..00a249f26bc3 100644
> > --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> > +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> > @@ -169,9 +169,15 @@ struct PPCHash64Options {
> >  extern const PPCHash64Options ppc_hash64_opts_basic;
> >  extern const PPCHash64Options ppc_hash64_opts_POWER7;
> >  
> > +static inline bool hash64_opts_has(const PPCHash64Options *opts,
> > +                                   unsigned feature)
> > +{
> > +    return !!(opts->flags & feature);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline bool ppc_hash64_has(PowerPCCPU *cpu, unsigned feature)
> >  {
> > -    return !!(cpu->hash64_opts->flags & feature);
> > +    return hash64_opts_has(cpu->hash64_opts, feature);
> >  }
> >  
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
> >   
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]