qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] spapr: split the IRQ allocation sequence


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] spapr: split the IRQ allocation sequence
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 19:21:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2

On 06/15/2018 03:14 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:53:01 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Today, when a device requests for IRQ number in a sPAPR machine, the
>> spapr_irq_alloc() routine first scans the ICSState status array to
>> find an empty slot and then performs the assignement of the selected
>> numbers. Split this sequence in two distinct routines : spapr_irq_find()
>> for lookups and spapr_irq_claim() for claiming the IRQ numbers.
>>
>> This will ease the introduction of a static layout of IRQ numbers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  5 ++++
>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c         | 64 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  hw/ppc/spapr_events.c  | 18 ++++++++++----
>>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c     | 19 ++++++++++++---
>>  hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c     | 10 +++++++-
>>  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> index 3388750fc795..6088f44c1b2a 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> @@ -776,6 +776,11 @@ int spapr_irq_alloc(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int 
>> irq_hint, bool lsi,
>>                      Error **errp);
>>  int spapr_irq_alloc_block(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int num, bool lsi,
>>                            bool align, Error **errp);
>> +int spapr_irq_find(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int num, bool align,
>> +                   Error **errp);
>> +#define spapr_irq_findone(spapr, errp) spapr_irq_find(spapr, 1, false, errp)
>> +int spapr_irq_claim(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num, bool lsi,
>> +                    Error **errp);
>>  void spapr_irq_free(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num);
>>  qemu_irq spapr_qirq(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq);
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index f59999daacfc..b1d19b328166 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -3810,6 +3810,36 @@ static int ics_find_free_block(ICSState *ics, int 
>> num, int alignnum)
>>      return -1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int spapr_irq_find(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int num, bool align, Error 
>> **errp)
>> +{
>> +    ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
>> +    int first = -1;
>> +
>> +    assert(ics);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * MSIMesage::data is used for storing VIRQ so
>> +     * it has to be aligned to num to support multiple
>> +     * MSI vectors. MSI-X is not affected by this.
>> +     * The hint is used for the first IRQ, the rest should
>> +     * be allocated continuously.
>> +     */
>> +    if (align) {
>> +        assert((num == 1) || (num == 2) || (num == 4) ||
>> +               (num == 8) || (num == 16) || (num == 32));
>> +        first = ics_find_free_block(ics, num, num);
>> +    } else {
>> +        first = ics_find_free_block(ics, num, 1);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (first < 0) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "can't find a free %d-IRQ block", num);
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return first + ics->offset;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Allocate the IRQ number and set the IRQ type, LSI or MSI
>>   */
>> @@ -3888,6 +3918,40 @@ int spapr_irq_alloc_block(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, 
>> int num, bool lsi,
>>      return first;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int spapr_irq_claim(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num, bool lsi,
>> +                    Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
>> +    int i;
>> +    int srcno = irq - ics->offset;
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    assert(ics);
>> +
>> +    if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq) || !ics_valid_irq(ics, irq + num)) {
> 
> I guess it is okay to assume that if the first and last irqs are valid,
> so are all numbers in between. Shouldn't the second check be against
> irq + num - 1 though ?

yes. thanks.

> This lacks an error_setg() BTW.
> 
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    for (i = srcno; i < srcno + num; ++i) {
>> +        if (ICS_IRQ_FREE(ics, i)) {
>> +            spapr_irq_set_lsi(spapr, i + ics->offset, lsi);
>> +        } else {
>> +            error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", i + ics->offset);
>> +            ret = -1;
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* we could call spapr_irq_free() when rolling back */
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +        while (--i >= srcno) {
>> +            memset(&ics->irqs[i], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState));
>> +        }
>> +    }
> 
> Hmm... I guess we should free the whole range otherwise we leak
> srcno + num - i irqs, preferably using spapr_irq_free() to match
> the traces from spapr_irq_alloc().

I don't understand. This is undoing what has been done. 

> Alternatively, the rollback could be pushed to the callers.

Yes. Today none is done so we might just do nothing about it
and return an error.
 
> Rest looks good.
> 
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  void spapr_irq_free(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num)
>>  {
>>      ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
>> index 86836f0626dc..3b6ae7272092 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
>> @@ -707,13 +707,18 @@ void spapr_clear_pending_events(sPAPRMachineState 
>> *spapr)
>>  
>>  void spapr_events_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
>>  {
>> +    int epow_irq;
>> +
>> +    epow_irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> +    spapr_irq_claim(spapr, epow_irq, 1, false, &error_fatal);
>> +
>>      QTAILQ_INIT(&spapr->pending_events);
>>  
>>      spapr->event_sources = spapr_event_sources_new();
>>  
>>      spapr_event_sources_register(spapr->event_sources, EVENT_CLASS_EPOW,
>> -                                 spapr_irq_alloc(spapr, 0, false,
>> -                                                  &error_fatal));
>> +                                 epow_irq);
>>  
>>      /* NOTE: if machine supports modern/dedicated hotplug event source,
>>       * we add it to the device-tree unconditionally. This means we may
>> @@ -724,9 +729,14 @@ void spapr_events_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
>>       * checking that it's enabled.
>>       */
>>      if (spapr->use_hotplug_event_source) {
>> +        int hp_irq;
>> +
>> +        hp_irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> +        spapr_irq_claim(spapr, hp_irq, 1, false, &error_fatal);
>> +
>>          spapr_event_sources_register(spapr->event_sources, 
>> EVENT_CLASS_HOT_PLUG,
>> -                                     spapr_irq_alloc(spapr, 0, false,
>> -                                                      &error_fatal));
>> +                                     hp_irq);
>>      }
>>  
>>      spapr->epow_notifier.notify = spapr_powerdown_req;
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> index f936ce63effa..7394c62b4a8b 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> @@ -371,8 +371,14 @@ static void rtas_ibm_change_msi(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
>> sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>>      }
>>  
>>      /* Allocate MSIs */
>> -    irq = spapr_irq_alloc_block(spapr, req_num, false,
>> -                           ret_intr_type == RTAS_TYPE_MSI, &err);
>> +    irq = spapr_irq_find(spapr, req_num, ret_intr_type == RTAS_TYPE_MSI, 
>> &err);
>> +    if (err) {
>> +        error_reportf_err(err, "Can't allocate MSIs for device %x: ",
>> +                          config_addr);
>> +        rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +    spapr_irq_claim(spapr, irq, req_num, false, &err);
>>      if (err) {
>>          error_reportf_err(err, "Can't allocate MSIs for device %x: ",
>>                            config_addr);
>> @@ -1698,7 +1704,14 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>          uint32_t irq;
>>          Error *local_err = NULL;
>>  
>> -        irq = spapr_irq_alloc_block(spapr, 1, true, false, &local_err);
>> +        irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &local_err);
>> +        if (local_err) {
>> +            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> +            error_prepend(errp, "can't allocate LSIs: ");
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        spapr_irq_claim(spapr, irq, 1, true, &local_err);
>>          if (local_err) {
>>              error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>>              error_prepend(errp, "can't allocate LSIs: ");
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> index 4555c648a8e2..ad9b56e28447 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> @@ -475,7 +475,15 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_realize(DeviceState *qdev, 
>> Error **errp)
>>          dev->qdev.id = id;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    dev->irq = spapr_irq_alloc(spapr, dev->irq, false, &local_err);
>> +    if (!dev->irq) {
>> +        dev->irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &local_err);
>> +        if (local_err) {
>> +            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    spapr_irq_claim(spapr, dev->irq, 1, false, &local_err);
>>      if (local_err) {
>>          error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>>          return;
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]