[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v7 2/4] vfio/pci: Relax DMA map
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v7 2/4] vfio/pci: Relax DMA map errors for MMIO regions |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:29:41 -0600 |
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:49:58 +0100
Auger Eric <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> On 09/02/18 08:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > At the moment if vfio_memory_listener is registered in the system memory
> > address space, it maps/unmaps every RAM memory region for DMA.
> > It expects system page size aligned memory sections so vfio_dma_map
> > would not fail and so far this has been the case. A mapping failure
> > would be fatal. A side effect of such behavior is that some MMIO pages
> > would not be mapped silently.
> >
> > However we are going to change MSIX BAR handling so we will end having
> > non-aligned sections in vfio_memory_listener (more details is in
> > the next patch) and vfio_dma_map will exit QEMU.
> >
> > In order to avoid fatal failures on what previously was not a failure and
> > was just silently ignored, this checks the section alignment to
> > the smallest supported IOMMU page size and prints an error if not aligned;
> > it also prints an error if vfio_dma_map failed despite the page size check.
> > Both errors are not fatal; only MMIO RAM regions are checked
> > (aka "RAM device" regions).
> >
> > If the amount of errors printed is overwhelming, the MSIX relocation
> > could be used to avoid excessive error output.
> >
> > This is unlikely to cause any behavioral change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/vfio/common.c | 55
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> > index f895e3c..736f271 100644
> > --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> > +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> > @@ -544,18 +544,40 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener
> > *listener,
> >
> > llsize = int128_sub(llend, int128_make64(iova));
> >
> > + if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) {
> > + hwaddr pgmask = (1ULL << ctz64(hostwin->iova_pgsizes)) - 1;
> > +
> > + if ((iova & pgmask) || (llsize & pgmask)) {
> > + error_report("Region 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx"..0x%"HWADDR_PRIx
> > + " is not aligned to 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx
> > + " and cannot be mapped for DMA",
> > + section->offset_within_region,
> > + int128_getlo(section->size),
> Didn't you want to print the section->offset_within_address_space
> instead of section->offset_within_region?
>
> For an 1000e card*, with a 64kB page, it outputs:
> "Region 0x50..0xffb0 is not aligned to 0x10000 and cannot be mapped for DMA"
>
> an absolute gpa range would be simpler I think.
I agree, the offset within the address space seems like it'd be much
easier to map back to the device. Since we're handling it as
non-fatal, perhaps we can even add "MMIO Region" to give the user a bit
more context where the issue occurs. Alexey, do you want to submit a
follow-up patch, or Eric, you may have the best resources to tune the
message. Thanks,
Alex
> * where Region 3: Memory at 100e0000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [size=16K] contains the MSIX table
>
> Capabilities: [a0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=5 Masked-
> Vector table: BAR=3 offset=00000000
> PBA: BAR=3 offset=00002000
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> > + pgmask + 1);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > ret = vfio_dma_map(container, iova, int128_get64(llsize),
> > vaddr, section->readonly);
> > if (ret) {
> > error_report("vfio_dma_map(%p, 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx", "
> > "0x%"HWADDR_PRIx", %p) = %d (%m)",
> > container, iova, int128_get64(llsize), vaddr, ret);
> > + if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) {
> > + /* Allow unexpected mappings not to be fatal for RAM devices */
> > + return;
> > + }
> > goto fail;
> > }
> >
> > return;
> >
> > fail:
> > + if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) {
> > + error_report("failed to vfio_dma_map. pci p2p may not work");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > /*
> > * On the initfn path, store the first error in the container so we
> > * can gracefully fail. Runtime, there's not much we can do other
> > @@ -577,6 +599,7 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_del(MemoryListener
> > *listener,
> > hwaddr iova, end;
> > Int128 llend, llsize;
> > int ret;
> > + bool try_unmap = true;
> >
> > if (vfio_listener_skipped_section(section)) {
> > trace_vfio_listener_region_del_skip(
> > @@ -629,13 +652,33 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_del(MemoryListener
> > *listener,
> >
> > trace_vfio_listener_region_del(iova, end);
> >
> > - ret = vfio_dma_unmap(container, iova, int128_get64(llsize));
> > + if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) {
> > + hwaddr pgmask;
> > + VFIOHostDMAWindow *hostwin;
> > + bool hostwin_found = false;
> > +
> > + QLIST_FOREACH(hostwin, &container->hostwin_list, hostwin_next) {
> > + if (hostwin->min_iova <= iova && end <= hostwin->max_iova) {
> > + hostwin_found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + assert(hostwin_found); /* or region_add() would have failed */
> > +
> > + pgmask = (1ULL << ctz64(hostwin->iova_pgsizes)) - 1;
> > + try_unmap = !((iova & pgmask) || (llsize & pgmask));
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (try_unmap) {
> > + ret = vfio_dma_unmap(container, iova, int128_get64(llsize));
> > + if (ret) {
> > + error_report("vfio_dma_unmap(%p, 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx", "
> > + "0x%"HWADDR_PRIx") = %d (%m)",
> > + container, iova, int128_get64(llsize), ret);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > memory_region_unref(section->mr);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - error_report("vfio_dma_unmap(%p, 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx", "
> > - "0x%"HWADDR_PRIx") = %d (%m)",
> > - container, iova, int128_get64(llsize), ret);
> > - }
> >
> > if (container->iommu_type == VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU) {
> > vfio_spapr_remove_window(container,
> >