Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] ppc440_pcix: Change some error_report to qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, ...)

[Thomas Huth]

On 08.03.2018 12:08, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Using log unimp is more appropriate for these messages and this also
> silences them by default so they won't clobber make check output when
> tests are added for this board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/ppc440_pcix.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc440_pcix.c b/hw/ppc/ppc440_pcix.c
> index ab2626a..fbffe82 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/ppc440_pcix.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/ppc440_pcix.c
> @@ -286,8 +286,9 @@ static void ppc440_pcix_reg_write4(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> addr,
>          break;
>  
>      default:
> -        error_report("%s: unhandled PCI internal register 0x%lx", __func__,
> -                     (unsigned long)addr);
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                      "%s: unhandled PCI internal register 0x%lx\n", 
> __func__,
> +                      (unsigned long)addr);
>          break;
>      }
>  }
> @@ -377,8 +378,9 @@ static uint64_t ppc440_pcix_reg_read4(void *opaque, 
> hwaddr addr,
>          break;
>  
>      default:
> -        error_report("%s: invalid PCI internal register 0x%lx", __func__,
> -                     (unsigned long)addr);
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                      "%s: invalid PCI internal register 0x%lx\n", __func__,
> +                      (unsigned long)addr);
>          val = 0;
>      }

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>