[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 2/2] spapr_pci: make index property mandatory
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 2/2] spapr_pci: make index property mandatory |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:03:58 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:14:44PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Creating several PHBs without index property confuses the DRC code
> and causes issues:
> - only the first index-less PHB is functional, the other ones will
> silently ignore hotplugging of PCI devices
> - QEMU will even terminate if these PHBs have cold-plugged devices
So, this is true, but it's kind of missing the point; we could fix
those things if we wanted. The real point here is that the non-index
option is more trouble than it's worth: it's difficult to use, keeps
requiring (potentially incompatible) changes when some new parameter
needs adding, and is awkward to check for collisions.
> qemu-system-ppc64: -device virtio-net,bus=pci2.0: an attached device
> is still awaiting release
>
> This happens because DR connectors for child PCI devices are created
> with a DRC index that is derived from the PHB's index property. If the
> PHBs are created without index, then the same value of -1 is used to
> compute the DRC indexes for both PHBs, hence causing the collision.
>
> Also, the index property is used to compute the placement of the PHB's
> memory regions. It is limited to 31 or 255, depending on the machine
> type version. This fits well with the requirements of DRC indexes, which
> need the PHB index to be a 16-bit value.
>
> This patch hence makes the index property mandatory. As a consequence,
> the PHB's memory regions and BUID are now always configured according
> to the index, and it is no longer possible to set them from the command
> line. We have to introduce a PHB instance init function to initialize
> the 64-bit window address to -1 because pseries-2.7 and older machines
> don't set it.
>
> This DOES BREAK backwards compat, but we don't think the non-index
> PHB feature was used in practice (at least libvirt doesn't) and the
> simplification is worth it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> ---
> v1->v2: - error out if mem64_win_pciaddr is set but mem64_win_size
> isn't
> - set mem64_win_addr to -1 for old configuration with 32-bit
> window below 2G in spapr_phb_realize()
> - drop instance init function
>
> RFC->v1: - as suggested dy David, updated the changelog to explicitely
> mention that we intentionally break backwards compat.
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 53
> +++++++++++-----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> index cf54160526fa..024638e18b53 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> @@ -1523,16 +1523,6 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> sPAPRMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> - if ((sphb->buid != (uint64_t)-1) || (sphb->dma_liobn[0] !=
> (uint32_t)-1)
> - || (sphb->dma_liobn[1] != (uint32_t)-1 && windows_supported == 2)
> - || (sphb->mem_win_addr != (hwaddr)-1)
> - || (sphb->mem64_win_addr != (hwaddr)-1)
> - || (sphb->io_win_addr != (hwaddr)-1)) {
> - error_setg(errp, "Either \"index\" or other parameters must"
> - " be specified for PAPR PHB, not both");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> smc->phb_placement(spapr, sphb->index,
> &sphb->buid, &sphb->io_win_addr,
> &sphb->mem_win_addr, &sphb->mem64_win_addr,
> @@ -1541,36 +1531,12 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> return;
> }
> - }
> -
> - if (sphb->buid == (uint64_t)-1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "BUID not specified for PHB");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if ((sphb->dma_liobn[0] == (uint32_t)-1) ||
> - ((sphb->dma_liobn[1] == (uint32_t)-1) && (windows_supported > 1))) {
> - error_setg(errp, "LIOBN(s) not specified for PHB");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (sphb->mem_win_addr == (hwaddr)-1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "Memory window address not specified for PHB");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (sphb->io_win_addr == (hwaddr)-1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "IO window address not specified for PHB");
> + } else {
> + error_setg(errp, "\"index\" for PAPR PHB is mandatory");
> return;
> }
>
> if (sphb->mem64_win_size != 0) {
> - if (sphb->mem64_win_addr == (hwaddr)-1) {
> - error_setg(errp,
> - "64-bit memory window address not specified for PHB");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> if (sphb->mem_win_size > SPAPR_PCI_MEM32_WIN_SIZE) {
> error_setg(errp, "32-bit memory window of size 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx
> " (max 2 GiB)", sphb->mem_win_size);
Some of these checks could probably just become assert()s now, where
they're things determined by the placement code and no longer have
parameters, a problem indicates a bug in the machine rather than a
user error.
> @@ -1581,6 +1547,9 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> /* 64-bit window defaults to identity mapping */
> sphb->mem64_win_pciaddr = sphb->mem64_win_addr;
> }
> + } else if (sphb->mem64_win_pciaddr != (hwaddr) -1) {
> + error_setg(errp, "64-bit memory window requires \"mem64_win_size\"");
> + return;
Likewise this new one.
> } else if (sphb->mem_win_size > SPAPR_PCI_MEM32_WIN_SIZE) {
> /*
> * For compatibility with old configuration, if no 64-bit MMIO
> @@ -1594,6 +1563,12 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> sphb->mem64_win_pciaddr =
> SPAPR_PCI_MEM_WIN_BUS_OFFSET + SPAPR_PCI_MEM32_WIN_SIZE;
> sphb->mem_win_size = SPAPR_PCI_MEM32_WIN_SIZE;
> + } else {
> + /* Old configuration with the 32-bit MMIO window <= 2GiB don't need a
> + * 64-bit MMIO window.
> + */
Wouldn't it be easier to just change the test below to check for size
!= 0 instead of checking for addr != -1 as it does now.
> + sphb->mem64_win_addr = (hwaddr) -1;
> + sphb->mem64_win_pciaddr = (hwaddr) -1;
> }
>
> if (spapr_pci_find_phb(spapr, sphb->buid)) {
> @@ -1789,18 +1764,12 @@ static void spapr_phb_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>
> static Property spapr_phb_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("index", sPAPRPHBState, index, -1),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("buid", sPAPRPHBState, buid, -1),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("liobn", sPAPRPHBState, dma_liobn[0], -1),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("liobn64", sPAPRPHBState, dma_liobn[1], -1),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mem_win_addr", sPAPRPHBState, mem_win_addr, -1),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mem_win_size", sPAPRPHBState, mem_win_size,
> SPAPR_PCI_MEM32_WIN_SIZE),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mem64_win_addr", sPAPRPHBState, mem64_win_addr, -1),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mem64_win_size", sPAPRPHBState, mem64_win_size,
> SPAPR_PCI_MEM64_WIN_SIZE),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mem64_win_pciaddr", sPAPRPHBState, mem64_win_pciaddr,
> -1),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("io_win_addr", sPAPRPHBState, io_win_addr, -1),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("io_win_size", sPAPRPHBState, io_win_size,
> SPAPR_PCI_IO_WIN_SIZE),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("dynamic-reconfiguration", sPAPRPHBState, dr_enabled,
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature