qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] spapr: Make h_register_pr


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] spapr: Make h_register_process_table hcall flags global
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 20:48:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0

On 19/05/2017 07:40, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> The flags used in h_register_process_table hcall are needed in spapr.c
> and hence move them to a header file. While doing so, give them
> slightly specific names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c   | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> index cea5d99..3915e6f 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -921,13 +921,6 @@ static void spapr_check_setup_free_hpt(sPAPRMachineState 
> *spapr,
>      return;
>  }
>  
> -#define FLAGS_MASK              0x01FULL
> -#define FLAG_MODIFY             0x10
> -#define FLAG_REGISTER           0x08
> -#define FLAG_RADIX              0x04
> -#define FLAG_HASH_PROC_TBL      0x02
> -#define FLAG_GTSE               0x01
> -
...
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index e581c4a..588872a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -685,4 +685,14 @@ int spapr_rng_populate_dt(void *fdt);
>  
>  void spapr_do_system_reset_on_cpu(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data arg);
>  
> +/*
> + * Defines for flag value used in H_REGISTER_PROC_TBL hcall.
> + */
> +#define SPAPR_PROC_TABLE_MASK        0x01FULL
> +#define SPAPR_PROC_TABLE_MODIFY      0x10
> +#define SPAPR_PROC_TABLE_REGISTER    0x08
> +#define SPAPR_PROC_TABLE_RADIX       0x04
> +#define SPAPR_PROC_TABLE_HPT_PT      0x02
> +#define SPAPR_PROC_TABLE_GTSE        0x01

I think it should be cleaner if you use 0x1fULL

Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]