qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] target-ppc: kvm: make use of KVM_CREATE_SPAP


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH qemu] target-ppc: kvm: make use of KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_64
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:32:31 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:48:49PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It is not urgent, just wanted to make sure that it is not forgotten
> and I do not need to do anything to update it. Thanks.

Ah.. sorry, I lost track of this one (and confused it with the kernel
series for VFIO acceleration).  Can you please resend the latest
version.

> On 02/03/17 13:40, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 09/01/17 13:53, David Gibson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:38:26PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>> On 03/01/17 13:26, David Gibson wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:13:12PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>>> KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability allows creating TCE tables in KVM which
> >>>>> allows having in-kernel acceleration for H_PUT_TCE_xxx hypercalls.
> >>>>> However it only supports 32bit DMA windows at zero bus offset.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is a new KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_64 capability which supports 64bit
> >>>>> window size, variable page size and bus offset.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This makes use of the new capability. The kernel headers are already
> >>>>> updated as the kernel support went in to v4.6.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 12 +++++++-----
> >>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c |  8 +++++---
> >>>>>  target-ppc/kvm.c     | 48 
> >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>>>>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> >>>>> index bd1d78bfbe..14320c2378 100644
> >>>>> --- a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> >>>>> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> >>>>> @@ -36,8 +36,9 @@ int kvmppc_booke_watchdog_enable(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
> >>>>>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >>>>>  off_t kvmppc_alloc_rma(void **rma);
> >>>>>  bool kvmppc_spapr_use_multitce(void);
> >>>>> -void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, uint32_t window_size, 
> >>>>> int *pfd,
> >>>>> -                              bool need_vfio);
> >>>>> +void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, uint32_t page_shift,
> >>>>> +                              uint64_t bus_offset, uint32_t nb_table,
> >>>>> +                              int *pfd, bool need_vfio);
> >>>>>  int kvmppc_remove_spapr_tce(void *table, int pfd, uint32_t 
> >>>>> window_size);
> >>>>>  int kvmppc_reset_htab(int shift_hint);
> >>>>>  uint64_t kvmppc_rma_size(uint64_t current_size, unsigned int 
> >>>>> hash_shift);
> >>>>> @@ -168,9 +169,10 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_spapr_use_multitce(void)
> >>>>>      return false;
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> -static inline void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn,
> >>>>> -                                            uint32_t window_size, int 
> >>>>> *fd,
> >>>>> -                                            bool need_vfio)
> >>>>> +static inline void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, uint32_t 
> >>>>> page_shift,
> >>>>> +                                            uint64_t bus_offset,
> >>>>> +                                            uint32_t nb_table,
> >>>>> +                                            int *pfd, bool need_vfio)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>>      return NULL;
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
> >>>>> index ae30bbe30f..29c80bb3c8 100644
> >>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
> >>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
> >>>>> @@ -79,15 +79,16 @@ static IOMMUAccessFlags 
> >>>>> spapr_tce_iommu_access_flags(uint64_t tce)
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  static uint64_t *spapr_tce_alloc_table(uint32_t liobn,
> >>>>>                                         uint32_t page_shift,
> >>>>> +                                       uint64_t bus_offset,
> >>>>>                                         uint32_t nb_table,
> >>>>>                                         int *fd,
> >>>>>                                         bool need_vfio)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>>      uint64_t *table = NULL;
> >>>>> -    uint64_t window_size = (uint64_t)nb_table << page_shift;
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> -    if (kvm_enabled() && !(window_size >> 32)) {
> >>>>> -        table = kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(liobn, window_size, fd, 
> >>>>> need_vfio);
> >>>>> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
> >>>>
> >>>> This is broken.  Previously, if we had a >4GiB window, we'd fall back
> >>>> to managing it in userspace, which would work, albeit slowly.  Now, if
> >>>> you have an older kernel which doesn't support KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_64 it
> >>>> will attempt to allocate it in the kernel, and fail completely.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No, kvmppc_create_spapr_tce() would return NULL and right after that there
> >>> is a "if (!table)" (it can be seen at the end of this chunk) to handle the
> >>> failure.
> >>
> >> Oh, yes, sorry.  For some reason I thought there was a return in that
> >> if block.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This was the only comment which turned out to be not a bug, what now? :)
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +        table = kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(liobn, page_shift, bus_offset, 
> >>>>> nb_table,
> >>>>> +                                        fd, need_vfio);
> >>>>>      }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>      if (!table) {
> >>>>> @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ void spapr_tce_table_enable(sPAPRTCETable *tcet,
> >>>>>      tcet->nb_table = nb_table;
> >>>>>      tcet->table = spapr_tce_alloc_table(tcet->liobn,
> >>>>>                                          tcet->page_shift,
> >>>>> +                                        tcet->bus_offset,
> >>>>>                                          tcet->nb_table,
> >>>>>                                          &tcet->fd,
> >>>>>                                          tcet->need_vfio);
> >>>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> >>>>> index 9c4834c4fc..6e91a4d8bb 100644
> >>>>> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> >>>>> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> >>>>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static int cap_booke_sregs;
> >>>>>  static int cap_ppc_smt;
> >>>>>  static int cap_ppc_rma;
> >>>>>  static int cap_spapr_tce;
> >>>>> +static int cap_spapr_tce_64;
> >>>>>  static int cap_spapr_multitce;
> >>>>>  static int cap_spapr_vfio;
> >>>>>  static int cap_hior;
> >>>>> @@ -123,6 +124,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
> >>>>>      cap_ppc_smt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_SMT);
> >>>>>      cap_ppc_rma = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_RMA);
> >>>>>      cap_spapr_tce = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE);
> >>>>> +    cap_spapr_tce_64 = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_64);
> >>>>>      cap_spapr_multitce = kvm_check_extension(s, 
> >>>>> KVM_CAP_SPAPR_MULTITCE);
> >>>>>      cap_spapr_vfio = false;
> >>>>>      cap_one_reg = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ONE_REG);
> >>>>> @@ -2201,13 +2203,10 @@ bool kvmppc_spapr_use_multitce(void)
> >>>>>      return cap_spapr_multitce;
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> -void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, uint32_t window_size, 
> >>>>> int *pfd,
> >>>>> -                              bool need_vfio)
> >>>>> +void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, uint32_t page_shift,
> >>>>> +                              uint64_t bus_offset, uint32_t nb_table,
> >>>>> +                              int *pfd, bool need_vfio)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>> -    struct kvm_create_spapr_tce args = {
> >>>>> -        .liobn = liobn,
> >>>>> -        .window_size = window_size,
> >>>>> -    };
> >>>>>      long len;
> >>>>>      int fd;
> >>>>>      void *table;
> >>>>> @@ -2220,14 +2219,41 @@ void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, 
> >>>>> uint32_t window_size, int *pfd,
> >>>>>          return NULL;
> >>>>>      }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> -    fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE, &args);
> >>>>> -    if (fd < 0) {
> >>>>> -        fprintf(stderr, "KVM: Failed to create TCE table for liobn 
> >>>>> 0x%x\n",
> >>>>> -                liobn);
> >>>>> +    if (cap_spapr_tce_64) {
> >>>>> +        struct kvm_create_spapr_tce_64 args = {
> >>>>> +            .liobn = liobn,
> >>>>> +            .page_shift = page_shift,
> >>>>> +            .offset = bus_offset >> page_shift,
> >>>>> +            .size = nb_table,
> >>>>> +            .flags = 0
> >>>>> +        };
> >>>>> +        fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_64, &args);
> >>>>> +        if (fd < 0) {
> >>>>> +            fprintf(stderr,
> >>>>> +                    "KVM: Failed to create TCE64 table for liobn 
> >>>>> 0x%x\n",
> >>>>> +                    liobn);
> >>>>> +            return NULL;
> >>>>> +        }
> >>>>> +    } else if (cap_spapr_tce) {
> >>>>> +        uint64_t window_size = (uint64_t) nb_table << page_shift;
> >>>>> +        struct kvm_create_spapr_tce args = {
> >>>>> +            .liobn = liobn,
> >>>>> +            .window_size = window_size,
> >>>>> +        };
> >>>>> +        if ((window_size != args.window_size) || bus_offset) {
> >>>>> +            return NULL;
> >>>>> +        }
> >>>>> +        fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE, &args);
> >>>>> +        if (fd < 0) {
> >>>>> +            fprintf(stderr, "KVM: Failed to create TCE table for liobn 
> >>>>> 0x%x\n",
> >>>>> +                    liobn);
> >>>>> +            return NULL;
> >>>>> +        }
> >>>>> +    } else {
> >>>>>          return NULL;
> >>>>>      }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> -    len = (window_size / SPAPR_TCE_PAGE_SIZE) * sizeof(uint64_t);
> >>>>> +    len = nb_table * sizeof(uint64_t);
> >>>>>      /* FIXME: round this up to page size */
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>      table = mmap(NULL, len, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 




-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]