qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] POWER9 TCG enablements - part 13


From: joserz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] POWER9 TCG enablements - part 13
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 23:29:37 -0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:11:31PM -0800, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> more information:
> 
> Type: series
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] POWER9 TCG enablements - part 13
> Message-id: address@hidden
> 
> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> BASE=base
> n=1
> total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
> failed=0
> 
> # Useful git options
> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
> git config --local diff.renames True
> 
> commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
> for c in $commits; do
>     echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..."
>     if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; 
> then
>         failed=1
>         echo
>     fi
>     n=$((n+1))
> done
> 
> exit $failed
> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
> 
> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
>  * [new tag]         patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
>  - [tag update]      patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
> Switched to a new branch 'test'
> 52f618a ppc: implement xssubqp instruction
> f7dfdbf ppc: implement xssqrtqp instruction
> 4d895a4 ppc: implement xsrqpxp instruction
> 5d49c07 ppc: implement xsrqpi[x] instruction
> 
> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> Checking PATCH 1/4: ppc: implement xsrqpi[x] instruction...
> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
> #125: FILE: target/ppc/translate/vsx-ops.inc.c:106:
> +#define GEN_VSX_Z23FORM_300(name, opc2, opc3, opc4, inval) \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x00, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x08, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x10, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x18, opc4 | 0x0, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x00, opc4 | 0x1, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x08, opc4 | 0x1, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x10, opc4 | 0x1, inval), \
> +GEN_VSX_XFORM_300_EO(name, opc2, opc3 | 0x18, opc4 | 0x1, inval)
> 

I tried to improve it but this style is used everywhere

> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 103 lines checked
> 
> Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Checking PATCH 2/4: ppc: implement xsrqpxp instruction...
> Checking PATCH 3/4: ppc: implement xssqrtqp instruction...
> Checking PATCH 4/4: ppc: implement xssubqp instruction...
> === OUTPUT END ===
> 
> Test command exited with code: 1
> 
> 
> ---
> Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
> Please send your feedback to address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]