[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC] pxb: Restrict to x86
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC] pxb: Restrict to x86 |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:58:03 +0200 |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:48:24AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 10:17:12AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On 01/06/2017 09:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:13:11AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > On 01/06/2017 07:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > > The PCI Expander Bridge (PXB) device is essentially a hack to allow
> > > > > different PCIe devices to be assigned to different NUMA nodes on x86.
> > > > > Each
> > > > > PXB is sort-of a separate PCI host bridge, except that its config
> > > > > space
> > > > > is shared with the config space of the main PCI host bridge, rather
> > > > > than
> > > > > being independent.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > > This is only necessary if the platform doesn't (easily) allow truly
> > > > > independent PCI host bridges. AFAIK that's just x86.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Indeed, it is possible to support independent PCI host bridges on x86 by
> > > > using a separate MMCONFIG space for each one and enable separate PCI
> > > > domains.
> > > > We simply didn't need this until now, but maybe will be implemented it
> > > > in the future.
> > >
> > > In fact I would say that's the cleanest way to do this on q35.
> >
> > Message received :)
>
> Just so I'm clear, these last two comments are essentially suggesting
> a follow up cleanup on x86, rather than suggesting a different
> approach for non-PC platforms, yes?
>
> If there are no objections to my original patch do you want to take it
> through your tree Michael, or should I take it through mine?
>
> --
> David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_
> _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Go ahead and take it through yours pls.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>