qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr_pci: Create PCI-express root bus b


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr_pci: Create PCI-express root bus by default
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:53:14 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:56:40 +1100
> Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > At the moment sPAPR PHB creates a root buf of TYPE_PCI_BUS type.
> > This means that vfio-pci devices attached to it (and this is
> > a default behaviour) hide PCIe extended capabilities as
> > the bus does not pass a pci_bus_is_express(pdev->bus) check.
> > 
> > This changes adds a default PCI bus type property to sPAPR PHB
> > and uses TYPE_PCIE_BUS if none passed; older machines get TYPE_PCI_BUS
> > for backward compatibility as a bus type is used in the bus name
> > so the root bus name becomes "pcie.0" instead of "pci.0".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > 
> > What can possibly go wrong with such change of a name?
> > From devices prospective, I cannot see any.
> > 
> > libvirt might get upset as "pci.0" will not be available,
> > will it make sense to create pcie.0 as a root bus and always
> > add a PCIe->PCI bridge and name its bus "pci.0"?
> > 
> > Or create root bus from TYPE_PCIE_BUS and force name to "pci.0"?
> > pci_register_bus() can do this.
> > 
> > 
> > ---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr.c              | 5 +++++
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c          | 5 ++++-
> >  include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h | 1 +
> >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index 0b3820b..a268511 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -2541,6 +2541,11 @@ DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(2_8, "2.8", true);
> >          .driver   = TYPE_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE,     \
> >          .property = "mem64_win_size",               \
> >          .value    = "0",                            \
> > +    },                                              \
> > +    {                                               \
> > +        .driver   = TYPE_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE,     \
> > +        .property = "root_bus_type",                \
> > +        .value    = TYPE_PCI_BUS,                   \
> >      },
> >  
> >  static void phb_placement_2_7(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t index,
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> > index 7cde30e..2fa1f22 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> > @@ -1434,7 +1434,9 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> > **errp)
> >      bus = pci_register_bus(dev, NULL,
> >                             pci_spapr_set_irq, pci_spapr_map_irq, sphb,
> >                             &sphb->memspace, &sphb->iospace,
> > -                           PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), PCI_NUM_PINS, TYPE_PCI_BUS);
> > +                           PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), PCI_NUM_PINS,
> > +                           sphb->root_bus_type ? sphb->root_bus_type :
> > +                           TYPE_PCIE_BUS);
> 
> Shouldn't we ensure that sphb->root_bus_type is either TYPE_PCIE_BUS or
> TYPE_PCI_BUS ?

Yes, I think so.  In fact, I think it would be better to make the
property a boolean that just selects PCI-E, rather than this which
exposes qemu (semi-)internal type names on the comamnd line.

> Otherwise, if we pass something like:
> 
> -global spapr-pci-host-bridge.root_bus_type=pcie
> 
> we get the following not really explicit error:
> 
> ERROR:/home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-spapr/qom/object.c:474:object_new_with_type: 
> assertion failed: (type != NULL)
> 
> >      phb->bus = bus;
> >      qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(phb->bus), DEVICE(sphb), NULL);
> >  
> > @@ -1590,6 +1592,7 @@ static Property spapr_phb_properties[] = {
> >      DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("pgsz", sPAPRPHBState, page_size_mask,
> >                         (1ULL << 12) | (1ULL << 16)),
> >      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("numa_node", sPAPRPHBState, numa_node, -1),
> > +    DEFINE_PROP_STRING("root_bus_type", sPAPRPHBState, root_bus_type),
> >      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >  };
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> > index b92c1b5..a4ee873 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct sPAPRPHBState {
> >      uint64_t dma64_win_addr;
> >  
> >      uint32_t numa_node;
> > +    char *root_bus_type;
> >  };
> >  
> >  #define SPAPR_PCI_MEM_WIN_BUS_OFFSET 0x80000000ULL
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]