Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 00/12] pseries: Consolidate guest device tree construction

[Bharata B Rao]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:23:41PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:50:02PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:04:31PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > For historical reasons construction of the guest device tree in spapr
> > > is divided between spapr_create_fdt_skel() which is called at init
> > > time, and spapr_build_fdt() which runs at reset time.  Over time, more
> > > and more things have needed to be moved to reset time.
> > > 
> > > This series consolidates all the device tree construction to reset
> > > time, with some minor cleanups along the way.  This will help to make
> > > it more maintainable in future.
> > > 
> > > Changes since v2:
> > >   * Removed a leftover reference to a variable called 'stdout',
> > >     shadowing the standard library stdout
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >   * Fixed a memory leak introduced by 1/12 (spotted by Thomas Huth)
> > >   * Removed one patch that's already merged in ppc-for-2.8
> > 
> > Thanks for the acks, everyone.  I've now merged this series into
> > ppc-for-2.8, tentatively.
> > 
> > Bharata Rao reported some boot failures caused by the series, but I
> > haven't been able to reproduce them so far.  Bharata, could you retest
> > with the latest version (in ppc-for-2.8) and, if the problems are
> > still present, send me some reproducer steps.
> 
> Actually, I just realised the bug Bharata reported looks identical to
> one someone else spotted.  That was caused by one of Thomas' NVRAM
> cleanups, rather than the DT cleanup.  It's already been removed from
> ppc-for-2.8 pending debug.

David - After I reported the boot failure with this patchset to you, I
figured out that the root cause was in fact the NVRAM patchset which
I later reported separately.

Regards,
Bharata.