[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] exec: move cpu_exec_init() ca
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] exec: move cpu_exec_init() calls to realize functions |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:13:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01) |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:22:52PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Modify all CPUs to call it from XXX_cpu_realizefn() function.
>
> Remove all the cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet as
> unsafe references have been moved to cpu_exec_realizefn().
> (tested with QOM command provided by commit 4c315c27)
>
> for arm:
>
> Setting of cpu->mp_affinity is moved from arm_cpu_initfn()
> to arm_cpu_realizefn() as setting of cpu_index is now done
> in cpu_exec_realizefn(). To avoid to overwrite an user defined
> value, we set it to an invalid value by default, and update
> it in realize function only if the value is still invalid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
> index 1b9540e..f0d2074 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> #include "kvm_arm.h"
>
> +#define MP_AFFINITY_INVALID (~ARM64_AFFINITY_MASK)
I would have defined this next to ARM64_AFFINITY_MASK in
target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> +
> static void arm_cpu_set_pc(CPUState *cs, vaddr value)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
> @@ -441,22 +443,11 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> CPUState *cs = CPU(obj);
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> static bool inited;
> - uint32_t Aff1, Aff0;
>
> cs->env_ptr = &cpu->env;
> - cpu_exec_init(cs, &error_abort);
> cpu->cp_regs = g_hash_table_new_full(g_int_hash, g_int_equal,
> g_free, g_free);
>
> - /* This cpu-id-to-MPIDR affinity is used only for TCG; KVM will override
> it.
> - * We don't support setting cluster ID ([16..23]) (known as Aff2
> - * in later ARM ARM versions), or any of the higher affinity level
> fields,
> - * so these bits always RAZ.
> - */
> - Aff1 = cs->cpu_index / ARM_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER;
> - Aff0 = cs->cpu_index % ARM_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER;
> - cpu->mp_affinity = (Aff1 << ARM_AFF1_SHIFT) | Aff0;
> -
> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> /* Our inbound IRQ and FIQ lines */
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> @@ -576,6 +567,14 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(dev);
> ARMCPUClass *acc = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
> CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> + uint32_t Aff1, Aff0;
> +
> + cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err);
> + if (local_err != NULL) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + return;
> + }
>
> /* Some features automatically imply others: */
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
> @@ -631,6 +630,17 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_THUMB_DSP);
> }
>
> + /* This cpu-id-to-MPIDR affinity is used only for TCG; KVM will override
> it.
> + * We don't support setting cluster ID ([16..23]) (known as Aff2
> + * in later ARM ARM versions), or any of the higher affinity level
> fields,
> + * so these bits always RAZ.
> + */
> + if (cpu->mp_affinity == MP_AFFINITY_INVALID) {
> + Aff1 = cs->cpu_index / ARM_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER;
> + Aff0 = cs->cpu_index % ARM_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER;
I think ARM_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER should be renamed to
ARM_DEFAULT_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER and either moved from where
it's currently defined (above arm_cpu_initfn) to just above
arm_cpu_realizefn, or to the same place as ARM64_AFFINITY_MASK
and MP_AFFINITY_INVALID.
Aff0 and Aff1 could be declared in this scope, as they're only
used here.
> + cpu->mp_affinity = (Aff1 << ARM_AFF1_SHIFT) | Aff0;
> + }
> +
> if (cpu->reset_hivecs) {
> cpu->reset_sctlr |= (1 << 13);
> }
> @@ -1461,7 +1471,7 @@ static Property arm_cpu_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("start-powered-off", ARMCPU, start_powered_off, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("psci-conduit", ARMCPU, psci_conduit, 0),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("midr", ARMCPU, midr, 0),
> - DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mp-affinity", ARMCPU, mp_affinity, 0),
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mp-affinity", ARMCPU, mp_affinity,
> MP_AFFINITY_INVALID),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
> };
>
> @@ -1533,17 +1543,6 @@ static void arm_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void
> *data)
> cc->debug_check_watchpoint = arm_debug_check_watchpoint;
>
> cc->disas_set_info = arm_disas_set_info;
> -
> - /*
> - * Reason: arm_cpu_initfn() calls cpu_exec_init(), which saves
> - * the object in cpus -> dangling pointer after final
> - * object_unref().
> - *
> - * Once this is fixed, the devices that create ARM CPUs should be
> - * updated not to set cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet,
> - * unless they still screw up something else.
> - */
> - dc->cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet = true;
> }
>
> static void cpu_register(const ARMCPUInfo *info)
[...]
Otherwise looks good to me.
Thanks,
drew
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 3/3] exec: call cpu_exec_exit() from a CPU unrealize common function, Laurent Vivier, 2016/10/18
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 0/3] Split cpu_exec_init() into an init and a realize part, Eduardo Habkost, 2016/10/18