Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v3 3/5] tests: use qtest_pc_boot()/qtest_shutdown() in virtio tests

[Greg Kurz]

On Sat,  1 Oct 2016 20:56:02 +0200
Laurent Vivier <address@hidden> wrote:

> This patch replaces calls to qtest_start() and qtest_end() by
> calls to qtest_pc_boot() and qtest_shutdown().
> 
> This allows to initialize memory allocator and PCI interface
> functions. This will ease to enable virtio tests on other
> architectures by only adding a specific qtest_XXX_boot() (like
> qtest_spapr_boot()).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> ---

Oops I had missed it during review but I have a single remark for the 9p
test.

My R-b stands anyway.

>  tests/virtio-9p-test.c   |  51 +++++++---------
>  tests/virtio-blk-test.c  | 150 
> ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  tests/virtio-net-test.c  |  39 +++++-------
>  tests/virtio-scsi-test.c |  67 +++++++++------------
>  4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/virtio-9p-test.c
> index e8b2196..7698014 100644
> --- a/tests/virtio-9p-test.c
> +++ b/tests/virtio-9p-test.c
> @@ -10,62 +10,56 @@
>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>  #include "libqtest.h"
>  #include "qemu-common.h"
> -#include "libqos/pci-pc.h"
> +#include "libqos/libqos-pc.h"
>  #include "libqos/virtio.h"
>  #include "libqos/virtio-pci.h"
> -#include "libqos/malloc.h"
> -#include "libqos/malloc-pc.h"
>  #include "standard-headers/linux/virtio_ids.h"
>  #include "standard-headers/linux/virtio_pci.h"
>  
>  static const char mount_tag[] = "qtest";
>  static char *test_share;
>  
> -static void qvirtio_9p_start(void)
> -{
> -    char *args;
>  
> +static QOSState *qvirtio_9p_start(void)
> +{
>      test_share = g_strdup("/tmp/qtest.XXXXXX");
>      g_assert_nonnull(mkdtemp(test_share));
> +    const char *cmd = "-fsdev local,id=fsdev0,security_model=none,path=%s "
> +                      "-device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=fsdev0,mount_tag=%s";
>  

Even if C99 supports declarations within the code, I prefer the old school way
of declaring variables followed by an empty line, at the top.

Cheers.

--
Greg