qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] spapr: Set stable_cpu_id for threads o


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] spapr: Set stable_cpu_id for threads of CPU cores
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:23:39 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:24:24PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:59:07 +1000
> David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:46:47AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:25:33 +1000
> > > David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:11:31PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:  
> > > > > On Thu,  7 Jul 2016 20:20:23 +0530
> > > > > Bharata B Rao <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > >     
> > > > > > Conditonally set stable_cpu_id for CPU threads that are created as 
> > > > > > part
> > > > > > of spapr CPU cores. The use of stable_cpu_id is enabled for 
> > > > > > pseries-2.7
> > > > > > onwards.
> > > > > >     
> > > > > 
> > > > > The last sentence is a bit confusing since the enablement actually 
> > > > > happens
> > > > > in patch 5/5.
> > > > >     
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > > > index b104778..0ec3513 100644
> > > > > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > > > @@ -293,8 +293,15 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState 
> > > > > > *dev, Error **errp)
> > > > > >      for (i = 0; i < cc->nr_threads; i++) {
> > > > > >          char id[32];
> > > > > >          obj = sc->threads + i * size;
> > > > > > +        CPUState *cs;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >          object_initialize(obj, size, typename);
> > > > > > +        cs = CPU(obj);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +        /* Use core_id (which is actually cpu_dt_id) as stable CPU 
> > > > > > id */    
> > > > > 
> > > > > It isn't what I had in mind. More something like below:
> > > > > 
> > > > > In ppc_spapr_init():
> > > > > 
> > > > >     for (i = 0; i < spapr_max_cores; i++) {
> > > > >         spapr->cores[i]->stable_id = i * smp_threads;
> > > > >     }
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > In spapr_cpu_core_realize():
> > > > > 
> > > > >     for (j = 0; j < cc->nr_threads; j++) {
> > > > >         stable_cpu_id = cc->stable_id + j;
> > > > >     }
> > > > > 
> > > > > So we need to introduce cc->stable_id.    
> > > > 
> > > > No, we don't.  Cores have had a stable ID since they were introduced.
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > I agree core_dt_id is stable but it is a DT concept.  
> > 
> > There is no core_dt_id.  There's just core-id, which is machine
> > assigned (via the query hotpluggable cpus interface) and stable.
> > 
> > > static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > > {
> > > [...]
> > >         for (i = 0; i < spapr_max_cores; i++) {
> > >             int core_dt_id = i * smt;  
> > 
> > ..uh, ok, except for that poorly named variable.  But that's because
> > this is in the machine type, and it knows it's going to use the same
> > ids to give to the core object and to put in the device tree.
> > 
> 
> It is core_id everywhere else.
> 
> $ git grep core_id hw/ppc/
> hw/ppc/spapr.c:        cpu_props->has_core_id = true;
> hw/ppc/spapr.c:        cpu_props->core_id = i * smt;
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:    spapr->cores[cc->core_id / smt] = NULL;
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:    drc = 
> spapr_dr_connector_by_id(SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU, cc->core_id);
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:    index = cc->core_id / smt;
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:    if (cc->core_id % smt) {
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:        error_setg(&local_err, "invalid core id 
> %d\n", cc->core_id);
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:    index = cc->core_id / smt;
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:        error_setg(&local_err, "core id %d out of 
> range", cc->core_id);
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c:        error_setg(&local_err, "core %d already 
> populated", cc->core_id);
> 
> $ git grep core_dt_id hw/ppc/
> hw/ppc/spapr.c:            int core_dt_id = i * smt;
> hw/ppc/spapr.c:                                       
> SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU, core_dt_id);
> hw/ppc/spapr.c:                object_property_set_int(core, core_dt_id, 
> CPU_CORE_PROP_CORE_ID,
> 
> I got confused because the current code still puts cpu_dt_id of thread0 in the
> device tree. And since cpu_dt_id is still being computed on cpu_index, it is
> a different beast (which needs to be killed since it even crashes simple
> hotplug/unplug scenarios).
> 
> > > [...]
> > >                 object_property_set_int(core, core_dt_id, 
> > > CPU_CORE_PROP_CORE_ID,
> > >                                         &error_fatal);
> > > 
> > > This patch produces stable_cpu_id in the [0...smt * smp_cores) range. I 
> > > find it
> > > awkward it depends on the host setup.  
> > 
> > True.  Possibly we should set these as i * (maximum plausible number
> > of threads).
> > 
> > The gotcha is that currently we're using the same "dt_id" to control
> > KVM's cpu id and that in turn controls the SMT level.  That's a poor
> > interface on the kernel side (my bad), but we have to live with it
> > now.  However we could de-couple that KVM id from the core-id.  It'd
> > no doubt cause some complications with kvm-xics, but we can probably
> > handle it.
> > 
> > > I'm suggesting we introduce cc->stable_id to be able to compute a simple
> > > stable_cpu_id in the range [0...max_cpus), like x86 and ARM.  
> > 
> > I really don't see what properties this is supposed to have that are
> > different from the existing core-id.
> > 
> 
> Simplicity of always having CPU0, 1, 2, 3... max_cpus in QEMU, and try
> to hide the "poor interface on the kernel side" from the code that
> does not need it... but maybe that is not that important.

Merely having contiguous values seems like a very poor trade off for
having two different IDs for the same object to get confused between.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]