[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate i
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:56:17 +0100 |
On 20 June 2016 at 09:21, Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> Would it maybe make sense to add some tests for this stuff to the
> tests/tcg/ folder to make sure that such regressions do not sneak back
> in in the future?
Wouldn't help very much, because tests/tcg doesn't get run.
(The underlying problem is "how do you have a good test
framework for all the TCG targets when you can't guarantee
to have the toolchains to build the test code for them?".)
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Anton Blanchard, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, David Gibson, 2016/06/16
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Richard Henderson, 2016/06/16
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Anton Blanchard, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Anton Blanchard, 2016/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Richard Henderson, 2016/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Thomas Huth, 2016/06/20
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/13] target-ppc: Use 32-bit rotate instead of deposit + 64-bit rotate, Thomas Huth, 2016/06/20