qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] spapr_pci: remove duplicate m


From: Nikunj A Dadhania
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] spapr_pci: remove duplicate macros
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 10:25:57 +0530
User-agent: Notmuch/0.17+27~gae47d61 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)

David Gibson <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:11:05AM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue,  5 May 2015 14:23:51 +0530
>> > Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
>> >> ---
>> >>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 11 -----------
>> >>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> >> index 2e7590c..4df3a33 100644
>> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> >> @@ -1475,17 +1475,6 @@ PCIHostState *spapr_create_phb(sPAPREnvironment 
>> >> *spapr, int index)
>> >>      return PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >> -/* Macros to operate with address in OF binding to PCI */
>> >> -#define b_x(x, p, l)    (((x) & ((1<<(l))-1)) << (p))
>> >> -#define b_n(x)          b_x((x), 31, 1) /* 0 if relocatable */
>> >> -#define b_p(x)          b_x((x), 30, 1) /* 1 if prefetchable */
>> >> -#define b_t(x)          b_x((x), 29, 1) /* 1 if the address is aliased */
>> >> -#define b_ss(x)         b_x((x), 24, 2) /* the space code */
>> >> -#define b_bbbbbbbb(x)   b_x((x), 16, 8) /* bus number */
>> >> -#define b_ddddd(x)      b_x((x), 11, 5) /* device number */
>> >> -#define b_fff(x)        b_x((x), 8, 3)  /* function number */
>> >> -#define b_rrrrrrrr(x)   b_x((x), 0, 8)  /* register number */
>> >
>> > Seems like the duplication is not in master yet, only in spapr-next,
>> > and has apparently been introduced by commit 2c938a6692c01818e 
>> > (spapr_pci: enable basic hotplug operations) ...
>> > So an alternative would be to fix up that patch instead. David?
>> 
>> Yes, that would be fine with me as well.
>
> I've amended the patch in spapr-next.

Great, I will rebase and drop this patch.
>
>> 
>> > Anyway, the duplication should go away, so:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> 
>> Regards
>> Nikunj
>> 
>
> -- 
> David Gibson                  | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au        | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ 
> _other_
>                               | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]