qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/mpc85xx: Pass 0 flags to board_init_f


From: York Sun
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/mpc85xx: Pass 0 flags to board_init_f
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:39:51 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

On 04/30/2014 10:38 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 30.04.14 19:28, York Sun wrote:
>> On 04/30/2014 10:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> The new generic board_init_f has an argument now that takes a number of
>>> prepopulated gd->flags bits. We don't have any, so let's set this to 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S |    1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S 
>>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S
>>> index 0149146..86883f5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S
>>> @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ _start_cont:
>>>     isync
>>>   
>>>     bl      cpu_init_f
>>> +   li      r3, 0
>>>     bl      board_init_f
>>>     isync
>>>   
>>>
>> I have this patch pending already http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/343618/. 
>> I
>> can take either one when merging.
> 
> Ah, sorry, missed that one. The patch is fairly trivial (though 
> debugging it was not - NULL pointer exceptions in printf() are no fun, 
> heh) and you were first, so please just take your patch.
> 
I should CC you to save you the time of debugging. It took me a while to find 
it.

York






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]