qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/2] PPC: Add dump_mmu() for 6xx


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/2] PPC: Add dump_mmu() for 6xx
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:16:16 +0200

On 18.06.2013, at 18:04, Fabien Chouteau wrote:

> On 06/18/2013 05:31 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> +    for (type = 0; type < 2; type++)
>> 
>> You need braces on these. Please run your patch through checkpatch.pl :).
> 
> I did ;)
> 
> -> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-PPC-Add-dump_mmu-for-6xx.patch
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 51 lines checked
> 
> 0001-PPC-Add-dump_mmu-for-6xx.patch has no obvious style problems and is 
> ready for submission.

Meh - broken script :). According to the CODING_STYLE convention all of the 
above need to be cluttered with braces ;).

> 
>> 
>>> +        for (way = 0; way < env->nb_ways; way++)
>>> +            for (entry = env->nb_tlb * type + env->tlb_per_way * way;
>>> +                 entry < (env->nb_tlb * type + env->tlb_per_way * (way + 
>>> 1));
>>> +                 entry++) {
>>> +
>>> +                tlb = &env->tlb.tlb6[entry];
>>> +                cpu_fprintf(f, "TLB %02d/%02d %s way:%d %s ["
>>> +                            TARGET_FMT_lx " " TARGET_FMT_lx "]\n",
>>> +                            entry % env->nb_tlb, env->nb_tlb,
>>> +                            type ? "code" : "data", way,
>>> +                            pte_is_valid(tlb->pte0) ? "valid" : "inval",
>>> +                            tlb->EPN, tlb->EPN + TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
>>> +            }
>> 
>> I thought 6xx and 74xx also support HTAB and SRs? Shouldn't we dump those as 
>> well?
>> 
> 
> I don't know what that is, can you send me an example of what the printf line 
> should be?

SRs are similar to the SLB that book3s_64 print out. Just that there are a 
fixed smaller number of them (16). Basically you'd dump the env->sr array, 
similar to how the debug functions in get_segment_6xx_tlb() dump it.

For the HTAB I think SDR1 should be enough, so you don't need to do too much 
here. If you like, you can just dump the decoded fields env->htab_base and 
env->htab_mask. Dumping the whole HTAB would just explode the output.

However, you also should definitely dump all (valid) BATs. Check out 
get_bat_6xx_tlb() for debug code that dumps BATs.


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]