qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/6] target-ppc: Synchronize more SPRs to KVM usin


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/6] target-ppc: Synchronize more SPRs to KVM using ONE_REG interface
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:32:42 +0100

On 24.01.2013, at 04:20, David Gibson wrote:

> There are currently a batch of occasionally used SPRs whose state we do
> not synchronize with KVM.  This might be a problem for debugging, and will
> definitely be a problem for savevm / migration.  KVM now supports accessing
> these registers via the KVM_{GET,SET}_ONE_REG interface, so this patch
> wires up the code to use this on the qemu side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
> target-ppc/cpu.h |    4 ++
> target-ppc/kvm.c |  142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu.h b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> index 953146e..6cb79fe 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ static inline void cpu_clone_regs(CPUPPCState *env, 
> target_ulong newsp)
> #define SPR_MPC_CMPH          (0x09B)
> #define SPR_MPC_LCTRL1        (0x09C)
> #define SPR_MPC_LCTRL2        (0x09D)
> +#define SPR_UAMOR             (0x09D)
> #define SPR_MPC_ICTRL         (0x09E)
> #define SPR_MPC_BAR           (0x09F)
> #define SPR_VRSAVE            (0x100)
> @@ -1535,6 +1536,7 @@ static inline void cpu_clone_regs(CPUPPCState *env, 
> target_ulong newsp)
> #define SPR_UPERF0            (0x310)
> #define SPR_UPERF1            (0x311)
> #define SPR_UPERF2            (0x312)
> +#define SPR_MMCRA             (0x312)
> #define SPR_UPERF3            (0x313)
> #define SPR_620_PMC1W         (0x313)
> #define SPR_UPERF4            (0x314)
> @@ -1544,7 +1546,9 @@ static inline void cpu_clone_regs(CPUPPCState *env, 
> target_ulong newsp)
> #define SPR_UPERF7            (0x317)
> #define SPR_UPERF8            (0x318)
> #define SPR_UPERF9            (0x319)
> +#define SPR_PMC7              (0x319)
> #define SPR_UPERFA            (0x31A)
> +#define SPR_PMC8              (0x31A)
> #define SPR_UPERFB            (0x31B)
> #define SPR_620_MMCR0W        (0x31B)
> #define SPR_UPERFC            (0x31C)
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> index 2f4f068..7604d0b 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static int cap_ppc_smt;
> static int cap_ppc_rma;
> static int cap_spapr_tce;
> static int cap_hior;
> +static int cap_one_reg;
> 
> /* XXX We have a race condition where we actually have a level triggered
>  *     interrupt, but the infrastructure can't expose that yet, so the guest
> @@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(KVMState *s)
>     cap_ppc_smt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_SMT);
>     cap_ppc_rma = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_RMA);
>     cap_spapr_tce = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE);
> +    cap_one_reg = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ONE_REG);
>     cap_hior = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_HIOR);
> 
>     if (!cap_interrupt_level) {
> @@ -444,6 +446,76 @@ static void kvm_sw_tlb_put(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>     g_free(bitmap);
> }
> 
> +static void kvm_get_one_spr(CPUState *cs, uint64_t id, int spr)
> +{
> +    PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    union {
> +        uint32_t u32;
> +        uint64_t u64;
> +    } val;
> +    struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> +        .id = id,
> +        .addr = (uintptr_t) &val,
> +    };
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, &reg);
> +    if (ret != 0) {
> +        fprintf(stderr, "Warning: Unable to retrieve SPR %d from KVM: %s\n",
> +                spr, strerror(errno));

Any way you could make this a WARN_ONCE style message?

> +    } else {
> +        switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) {
> +        case KVM_REG_SIZE_U32:
> +            env->spr[spr] = val.u32;
> +            break;
> +
> +        case KVM_REG_SIZE_U64:
> +            env->spr[spr] = val.u64;
> +            break;
> +
> +        default:
> +            /* Don't handle this size yet */
> +            abort();
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_put_one_spr(CPUState *cs, uint64_t id, int spr)
> +{
> +    PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    union {
> +        uint32_t u32;
> +        uint64_t u64;
> +    } val;
> +    struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> +        .id = id,
> +        .addr = (uintptr_t) &val,
> +    };
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) {
> +    case KVM_REG_SIZE_U32:
> +        val.u32 = env->spr[spr];
> +        break;
> +
> +    case KVM_REG_SIZE_U64:
> +        val.u64 = env->spr[spr];
> +        break;
> +
> +    default:
> +        /* Don't handle this size yet */
> +        abort();
> +    }
> +
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
> +    if (ret != 0) {
> +        fprintf(stderr, "Warning: Unable to set SPR %d to KVM: %s\n",
> +                spr, strerror(errno));
> +    }
> +}
> +
> int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
> {
>     PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> @@ -524,16 +596,35 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
>         }
>     }
> 
> -    if (cap_hior && (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE)) {
> -        uint64_t hior = env->spr[SPR_HIOR];
> -        struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> -            .id = KVM_REG_PPC_HIOR,
> -            .addr = (uintptr_t) &hior,
> -        };
> -
> -        ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
> -        if (ret) {
> -            return ret;
> +    if (cap_one_reg) {

This needs a check that we're on book3s. Otherwise you just spam booke users.


Alex

> +        /* We deliberately ignore errors here, for kernels which have
> +         * the ONE_REG calls, but don't support the specific
> +         * registers.  There's still a good chance things will work,
> +         * as long as we don't try to migrate */
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DABR, SPR_DABR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DSCR, SPR_DSCR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PURR, SPR_PURR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_SPURR, SPR_SPURR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DAR, SPR_DAR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DSISR, SPR_DSISR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_AMR, SPR_AMR);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR, SPR_UAMOR);
> +
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0, SPR_MMCR0);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1, SPR_MMCR1);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA, SPR_MMCRA);
> +
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1, SPR_PMC1);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC2, SPR_PMC2);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC3, SPR_PMC3);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC4, SPR_PMC4);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC5, SPR_PMC5);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC6, SPR_PMC6);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC7, SPR_PMC7);
> +        kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8, SPR_PMC8);
> +
> +        if (cap_hior && (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE)) {
> +            kvm_put_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_HIOR, SPR_HIOR);
>         }
>     }
> 
> @@ -716,6 +807,37 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
>         }
>     }
> 
> +    if (cap_one_reg) {
> +        /* We deliberately ignore errors here, for kernels which have
> +         * the ONE_REG calls, but don't support the specific
> +         * registers.  There's still a good chance things will work,
> +         * as long as we don't try to migrate */
> +        if (cap_hior) {
> +            kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_HIOR, SPR_HIOR);
> +        }
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DABR, SPR_DABR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DSCR, SPR_DSCR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PURR, SPR_PURR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_SPURR, SPR_SPURR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DAR, SPR_DAR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_DSISR, SPR_DSISR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_AMR, SPR_AMR);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR, SPR_UAMOR);
> +
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0, SPR_MMCR0);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1, SPR_MMCR1);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA, SPR_MMCRA);
> +
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1, SPR_PMC1);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC2, SPR_PMC2);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC3, SPR_PMC3);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC4, SPR_PMC4);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC5, SPR_PMC5);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC6, SPR_PMC6);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC7, SPR_PMC7);
> +        kvm_get_one_spr(cs, KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8, SPR_PMC8);
> +    }
> +
>     return 0;
> }
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]