qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/3] e500: Adding CCSR memory region


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/3] e500: Adding CCSR memory region
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:58:11 +0200

On 08.10.2012, at 19:21, Andreas Färber wrote:

> Am 08.10.2012 18:46, schrieb Bharat Bhushan:
>> All devices are also placed under CCSR memory region.
>> The CCSR memory region is exported to pci device. The MSI interrupt
>> generation is the main reason to export the CCSR region to PCI device.
>> This put the requirement to move mpic under CCSR region, but logically
>> all devices should be under CCSR. So this patch places all emulated
>> devices under ccsr region.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/e500.c |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/e500.c b/hw/ppc/e500.c
>> index 1949c81..b3e6a1e 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/e500.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/e500.c
>> @@ -46,14 +46,16 @@
>> /* TODO: parameterize */
>> #define MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE       0xE0000000ULL
>> #define MPC8544_CCSRBAR_SIZE       0x00100000ULL
>> -#define MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_BASE     (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE + 0x40000ULL)
>> -#define MPC8544_SERIAL0_REGS_BASE  (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE + 0x4500ULL)
>> -#define MPC8544_SERIAL1_REGS_BASE  (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE + 0x4600ULL)
>> -#define MPC8544_PCI_REGS_BASE      (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE + 0x8000ULL)
>> +#define MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_OFFSET   0x40000ULL
>> +#define MPC8544_SERIAL0_REGS_OFFSET 0x4500ULL
>> +#define MPC8544_SERIAL1_REGS_OFFSET 0x4600ULL
>> +#define MPC8544_PCI_REGS_OFFSET    0x8000ULL
>> +#define MPC8544_PCI_REGS_BASE      (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE + \
>> +                                    MPC8544_PCI_REGS_OFFSET)
>> #define MPC8544_PCI_REGS_SIZE      0x1000ULL
>> #define MPC8544_PCI_IO             0xE1000000ULL
>> #define MPC8544_PCI_IOLEN          0x10000ULL
>> -#define MPC8544_UTIL_BASE          (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE + 0xe0000ULL)
>> +#define MPC8544_UTIL_OFFSET        0xe0000ULL
>> #define MPC8544_SPIN_BASE          0xEF000000ULL
>> 
>> struct boot_info
>> @@ -268,13 +270,12 @@ static int ppce500_load_device_tree(CPUPPCState *env,
>>     /* XXX should contain a reasonable value */
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop_cell(fdt, soc, "bus-frequency", 0);
>> 
>> -    snprintf(mpic, sizeof(mpic), "%s/address@hidden", soc,
>> -             MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_BASE - MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE);
>> +    snprintf(mpic, sizeof(mpic), "%s/address@hidden", soc, 
>> MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_OFFSET);
>>     qemu_devtree_add_subnode(fdt, mpic);
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop_string(fdt, mpic, "device_type", "open-pic");
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop_string(fdt, mpic, "compatible", "chrp,open-pic");
>> -    qemu_devtree_setprop_cells(fdt, mpic, "reg", MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_BASE -
>> -                               MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE, 0x40000);
>> +    qemu_devtree_setprop_cells(fdt, mpic, "reg", MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_OFFSET,
>> +                               0x40000);
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop_cell(fdt, mpic, "#address-cells", 0);
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop_cell(fdt, mpic, "#interrupt-cells", 2);
>>     mpic_ph = qemu_devtree_alloc_phandle(fdt);
>> @@ -287,17 +288,16 @@ static int ppce500_load_device_tree(CPUPPCState *env,
>>      * device it finds in the dt as serial output device. And we generate
>>      * devices in reverse order to the dt.
>>      */
>> -    dt_serial_create(fdt, MPC8544_SERIAL1_REGS_BASE - MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE,
>> +    dt_serial_create(fdt, MPC8544_SERIAL1_REGS_OFFSET,
>>                      soc, mpic, "serial1", 1, false);
>> -    dt_serial_create(fdt, MPC8544_SERIAL0_REGS_BASE - MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE,
>> +    dt_serial_create(fdt, MPC8544_SERIAL0_REGS_OFFSET,
>>                      soc, mpic, "serial0", 0, true);
>> 
>>     snprintf(gutil, sizeof(gutil), "%s/address@hidden", soc,
>> -             MPC8544_UTIL_BASE - MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE);
>> +             MPC8544_UTIL_OFFSET);
>>     qemu_devtree_add_subnode(fdt, gutil);
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop_string(fdt, gutil, "compatible", 
>> "fsl,mpc8544-guts");
>> -    qemu_devtree_setprop_cells(fdt, gutil, "reg", MPC8544_UTIL_BASE -
>> -                               MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE, 0x1000);
>> +    qemu_devtree_setprop_cells(fdt, gutil, "reg", MPC8544_UTIL_OFFSET, 
>> 0x1000);
>>     qemu_devtree_setprop(fdt, gutil, "fsl,has-rstcr", NULL, 0);
>> 
>>     snprintf(pci, sizeof(pci), "/address@hidden", MPC8544_PCI_REGS_BASE);
>> @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ void ppce500_init(PPCE500Params *params)
>>     qemu_irq **irqs, *mpic;
>>     DeviceState *dev;
>>     CPUPPCState *firstenv = NULL;
>> +    MemoryRegion *ccsr;
>> +    SysBusDevice *s;
>> 
>>     /* Setup CPUs */
>>     if (params->cpu_model == NULL) {
>> @@ -451,7 +453,8 @@ void ppce500_init(PPCE500Params *params)
>>         irqs[i][OPENPIC_OUTPUT_INT] = input[PPCE500_INPUT_INT];
>>         irqs[i][OPENPIC_OUTPUT_CINT] = input[PPCE500_INPUT_CINT];
>>         env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_PIR] = env->cpu_index = i;
>> -        env->mpic_cpu_base = MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_BASE + 0x20000;
>> +        env->mpic_cpu_base = MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE +
>> +                              MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_OFFSET + 0x20000;
>> 
>>         ppc_booke_timers_init(env, 400000000, PPC_TIMER_E500);
>> 
>> @@ -478,8 +481,12 @@ void ppce500_init(PPCE500Params *params)
>>     vmstate_register_ram_global(ram);
>>     memory_region_add_subregion(address_space_mem, 0, ram);
>> 
>> +    ccsr = g_malloc0(sizeof(MemoryRegion));
>> +    memory_region_init(ccsr, "e500-cssr", MPC8544_CCSRBAR_SIZE);
>> +    memory_region_add_subregion(address_space_mem, MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE, 
>> ccsr);
>> +
>>     /* MPIC */
>> -    mpic = mpic_init(address_space_mem, MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_BASE,
>> +    mpic = mpic_init(ccsr, MPC8544_MPIC_REGS_OFFSET,
>>                      smp_cpus, irqs, NULL);
>> 
>>     if (!mpic) {
>> @@ -488,25 +495,33 @@ void ppce500_init(PPCE500Params *params)
>> 
>>     /* Serial */
>>     if (serial_hds[0]) {
>> -        serial_mm_init(address_space_mem, MPC8544_SERIAL0_REGS_BASE,
>> +        serial_mm_init(ccsr, MPC8544_SERIAL0_REGS_OFFSET,
>>                        0, mpic[12+26], 399193,
>>                        serial_hds[0], DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN);
>>     }
>> 
>>     if (serial_hds[1]) {
>> -        serial_mm_init(address_space_mem, MPC8544_SERIAL1_REGS_BASE,
>> +        serial_mm_init(ccsr, MPC8544_SERIAL1_REGS_OFFSET,
>>                        0, mpic[12+26], 399193,
>>                        serial_hds[1], DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN);
>>     }
>> 
>>     /* General Utility device */
>> -    sysbus_create_simple("mpc8544-guts", MPC8544_UTIL_BASE, NULL);
>> +    dev = qdev_create(NULL, "mpc8544-guts");
>> +    qdev_init_nofail(dev);
>> +    s = sysbus_from_qdev(dev);
> 
> s = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);

Mind to explain why? The rest of the code uses the above helper :).

> 
>> +    memory_region_add_subregion(ccsr, MPC8544_UTIL_OFFSET, 
>> s->mmio[0].memory);
> 
> Hmm ...
> 
>> 
>>     /* PCI */
>> -    dev = sysbus_create_varargs("e500-pcihost", MPC8544_PCI_REGS_BASE,
>> -                                mpic[pci_irq_nrs[0]], mpic[pci_irq_nrs[1]],
>> -                                mpic[pci_irq_nrs[2]], mpic[pci_irq_nrs[3]],
>> -                                NULL);
>> +    dev = qdev_create(NULL, "e500-pcihost");
>> +    qdev_init_nofail(dev);
>> +    s = sysbus_from_qdev(dev);
> 
> (dito)
> 
>> +    sysbus_connect_irq(s, 0, mpic[pci_irq_nrs[0]]);
>> +    sysbus_connect_irq(s, 1, mpic[pci_irq_nrs[1]]);
>> +    sysbus_connect_irq(s, 2, mpic[pci_irq_nrs[2]]);
>> +    sysbus_connect_irq(s, 3, mpic[pci_irq_nrs[3]]);
>> +    memory_region_add_subregion(ccsr, MPC8544_PCI_REGS_OFFSET, 
>> s->mmio[0].memory);
> 
> ... I wonder if fiddling with SysBus MMIO is a good idea.
> s->mmio[0].addr is not getting assigned this way, which is checked as
> condition for deleting the subregion. But sysbus_mmio_map() only adds to
> / deletes from get_system_memory().
> The alternative would be using a custom field rather than the
> SysBus-internal one. Avi/Alex?

I honestly don't mind either way. We could

  a) add a new sysbus helper for maps in memory region containers
  b) not use sysbus at all
  c) do it this way

Anything else wouldn't improve the situation. I really don't care which way we 
go. To me, c) is fine.


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]