qemu-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-discuss] Qemu on Windows (with haxm and whpx), minimal Ubuntu,


From: Michael Fritscher
Subject: Re: [Qemu-discuss] Qemu on Windows (with haxm and whpx), minimal Ubuntu, SLIRP and OpenVPN: very slow
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:35:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3

Am 13.05.2019 um 16:10:33 schrieb Michael Fritscher:
Am Montag, 13. Mai 2019 15:25 CEST, Michael Fritscher <address@hidden> schrieb:
Am 13.05.2019 um 10:32:48 schrieb Michael Fritscher:
Good day,

Scenario:
Host: Windows 7 and 10 64 bit, Skylake+ CPUs
Qemu Version: 3.1 (4.0 isn't available yet on https://qemu.weilnetz.de/)
Accelerators: HAXM and WHPX
Guest: Ubuntu 18.04.2 64 bit, minimal install
Guest's tasks: OpenVPN, iptables, tc

Configuration:
-machine q35,accel=kvm:hvf:whpx:hax:tcg
-m 512
-smp 1
-rtc base=utc
-drive file=layertc_environmentmanager_amsvm.iso,if=virtio,media=cdrom
-vga std
-netdev
      user,id=natted,
      restrict=n,
      net=172.31.1.0/255.255.255.0,
      dhcpstart=172.31.1.1,
      host=172.31.1.3,
      dns=172.31.1.4
-device virtio-net,netdev=natted,mac=00:50:56:00:08:00
-nodefaults
-monitor tcp:localhost:4444
-kernel vmlinuz
-initrd initrd.img
-append "boot=casper textonly quiet nosplash nofb fb=false pti=off spectre_v2=off 
l1tf=off nospec_store_bypass_disable noprompt"

(the iso is a casper livecd, but I start the linux kernel directly because of 
boot speed)

Problem:
It is slow...
While a openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-128-cbc is ok (500MB/sec and beyond), 
OpenVPN struggles.
I get 70% virtual CPU usage , mostly on OpenVPN and system load while 
transfering 1-2 MB/s with a UDP video stream. The measured delay is also
rather spiky and is about 30...40 ms. On the host I get a cpu usage of about 
10% (=almost a core) I see this both on the server and the client
side.

On the player edition of the big commercial player, the results are _much_ 
better (10% virtual CPU usage, delay of 4-6 ms)

How can I further debug this? Do you know any knobs I can try? Slirp, while 
there are warnings of being slow, doesn't seem to be the culprit as
I can get easily >>10 MB/s through it. And I see the big CPU usage of OpenVPN

Best regards,
Michael Fritscher


Hi again,

after a bit of digging, openVPN seems to call read_hpet with about 1 kHz, which 
is, regarding to the program perf, the main culprit. Is a call
rate of this frequency normal and qemu is just very slow to handle them, or is 
there another problem?

Best regards,
Michael Fritscher
--
ZfT - Zentrum für Telematik e.V.
Michael Fritscher
Magdalene-Schoch-Straße 5
97074 Würzburg
Tel: +49 (931) 615 633 - 57
Fax: +49 (931) 615 633 - 11
Email: address@hidden
Web: http://www.telematik-zentrum.de

Vorstand:
Prof. Dr. Klaus Schilling, Prof. Dr. Andreas Nüchter,  Hans-Joachim Leistner
Sitz: Gerbrunn
USt.-ID Nr.: DE 257 244 580, Steuer-Nr.:  257/111/70203
Amtsgericht Würzburg, Vereinsregister-Nr.: VR 200 167

For reference, on VWare Player I've even _no_ hpet_read. Seem I need to dig into OpenVPN further. Could be a bad time jitter or something the problem?

Best regards,
Michael Fritscher


--
ZfT - Zentrum für Telematik e.V.
Michael Fritscher
Magdalene-Schoch-Straße 5
97074 Würzburg
Tel: +49 (931) 615 633 - 57
Fax: +49 (931) 615 633 - 11
Email: address@hidden
Web: http://www.telematik-zentrum.de

Vorstand:
Prof. Dr. Klaus Schilling, Prof. Dr. Andreas Nüchter,  Hans-Joachim Leistner
Sitz: Gerbrunn
USt.-ID Nr.: DE 257 244 580, Steuer-Nr.:  257/111/70203
Amtsgericht Würzburg, Vereinsregister-Nr.: VR 200 167

Attachment: michael_fritscher.vcf
Description: Vcard


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]