|Subject:||Re: [Qemu-discuss] Guest execution statistics from QEMU|
|Date:||Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:46:17 -0300|
to the list, sorry-- Julio H. Morimoto
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
Did you mean to send that to the list rather than just me?
On 18 August 2014 22:03, JHM <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, I'll humbly apologize for wasting everyone's time :(
> Our client connections are coming from Brazil and the server is hosted in
> Canada. Turns out, the ISP we are using had issues that were resolved last
> night. I haven't changed any qemu parameters for the last couple of days.
> Last night we had a brief internet outage at the ISP level. Once it was
> back, download speeds were back to normal.
> Thanks everyone for commeting.
> -- Julio H. Morimoto
> -- address@hidden
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>> On 18 August 2014 15:32, Dale R. Worley <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > The "per each function call" metric is tricky, because you'd need to
>> > define what a "function call" is.
>> In particular, on some guest CPU architectures it's genuinely
>> not possible to reliably distinguish function call return from a
>> computed branch.
>> -- PMM
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|