qemu-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-discuss] qemu guests using 802.1q vlans bridged on host


From: Stephan von Krawczynski
Subject: Re: [Qemu-discuss] qemu guests using 802.1q vlans bridged on host
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:13:27 +0200

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:50:11 -0400
Vlad Yasevich <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Rally? I mean isn't using tagged 802.1q vlans something pretty normal? I
> > cannot believe that linux is incapable of doing what every 10 bucks desktop
> > switch and its bridge can...
> 
> 
> Yes, it is normal.  I just tried the same on 3.10.10 kernel and it works 
> fine.  My config was:
> 
> #brctl show br0
> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> br0             8000.5254001f7aef       no              eth0
>                                                          vnet0
> 
> 
> vnet0 is just a tap interface on top of which VM is running.
> 
> Inside VM, vlan100 is configured with an address.  Another host
> configured vlan100 as well and I can send traffic between the two
> just fine.
> 
> -vlad

And what type of network card do you use for eth0 ?

--
Regards,
Stephan


> 
> 
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > Stephan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:58:08 -0700
> > Tony Su <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> I haven't investigated what you describe so can't offer much help...
> >>
> >> But my reaction is that if it's not possible to configure some kind of
> >> "master vlan tag" I'd consider "packaging" all the VLANs through a VPN
> >> just long enough to pass through any major obstacles (technical or
> >> onerous work). Of course such an approach would likely come with
> >> significant overhead but it's a matter of trade-offs.
> >>
> >> Or, I suppose that you could attempt to script the creation of your
> >> bridges and just deal with them all.
> >>
> >> Tony
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski
> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > Sorry, you misunderstood my writing. I am talking of several hundred 
> >> > vlans
> >> > with - of course - different ids and quite some guests (around 50).
> >> > There is no way to simplify this setup besides the trivial way of a 
> >> > bridge
> >> > that carries all vlan-tagged interfaces. The trivial thing about it is 
> >> > all
> >> > these different vlans come in through one trunk. So if vlan-tagged 
> >> > bridging
> >> > worked I would have only one bridge interface with 50 guests connected 
> >> > ...
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Stephan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:29:59 -0700
> >> > Tony Su <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> If you're configuring the all your "hundreds" of guests to connect to
> >> >> the same VLAN, then you should able to simply configure all guests to
> >> >> connect to the same working bridge device without further
> >> >> configuration.
> >> >>
> >> >> You're surely not trying to configure hundreds of individual vlans,
> >> >> separate ones for each guest?
> >> >>
> >> >> Tony
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski
> >> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> > Hello Tony,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > thank you for answering, my comments are inline. Just as an 
> >> >> > additional hint to
> >> >> > what I've tested so far. Since I found vlan bridging not working I 
> >> >> > configured
> >> >> > the vlan on the host and put that interface to a bridge and over to a 
> >> >> > virtio
> >> >> > device (non-vlan-tagged) in the guest. As you might expect this works
> >> >> > perfectly. Unfortunately it is not useable for me, because if you 
> >> >> > want several
> >> >> > hundred vlans to several guests you will end up configuring hundreds 
> >> >> > of
> >> >> > bridges and interfaces.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:32:42 -0700
> >> >> > Tony Su <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Have you
> >> >> >> - Tested without VLAN tags?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, works perfectly.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> - Verified IP Forwarding is enabled, I usually see this implemented 
> >> >> >> in
> >> >> >> /etc/sysctl.conf and not written directly to the /proc files
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, forwarding is active.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> - Disabled all the transparent bridge filters, typicallly at
> >> >> >> /proc/sys/net/bridge/* again, although you can write directly to 
> >> >> >> these
> >> >> >> files I'd recommend you simply add the commands to your sysctl.conf
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, I played with these a bit but found out that there is no effect 
> >> >> > on my
> >> >> > problem.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> - Verified any personal FW is configured properly.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > There is none.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Tony
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski
> >> >> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hello all,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I'd like to do something very simple - at least that's what I 
> >> >> >> > thought
> >> >> >> > I want a guest to have access to a network just as if he was 
> >> >> >> > connected to the
> >> >> >> > real card, but set up as bridge on the host and virtio network 
> >> >> >> > driver. The
> >> >> >> > guest should be able to configure and use some or maybe even many 
> >> >> >> > 802.1q vlans
> >> >> >> > on this network and the traffic should go out tagged.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > So I setup the hosts bridge and connected an intel network card 
> >> >> >> > and a qemu
> >> >> >> > virtio card. Now the problem: No vlan-tagged traffic from the 
> >> >> >> > physical
> >> >> >> > interface reaches the guest at all, and no vlan-tagged traffic 
> >> >> >> > from the guest
> >> >> >> > reaches the physical net over the bridge. One major reason for 
> >> >> >> > this is the
> >> >> >> > vlan offloading by the host interface card (intel). Another seems 
> >> >> >> > to be that
> >> >> >> > arp requests are somehow not going through the bridge for the 
> >> >> >> > vlans.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I hope that someone here has used 802.1q vlans inside guests 
> >> >> >> > before and can
> >> >> >> > share some tips how to make this work. Because out-of-the-box it 
> >> >> >> > does not. All
> >> >> >> > system are linux of course and with latest kernels (3.10.9 
> >> >> >> > currently).
> >> >> >> > qemu is 1.5.2.
> >> >> >> > Thanks for any hints.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> >> > Stephan
> >
> >
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]