qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v42 27/98] hw/sd/sdcard: Convert SEND_NUM_WR_BLOCKS to generi


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH v42 27/98] hw/sd/sdcard: Convert SEND_NUM_WR_BLOCKS to generic_read_byte (ACMD22)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:48:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 6/28/24 9:01 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>

Thanks,

C.


---
  hw/sd/sd.c | 16 ++++------------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
index 1c4811f410..8d02cd9a26 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
@@ -1715,11 +1715,9 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_app_command(SDState *sd,
      case 22:  /* ACMD22: SEND_NUM_WR_BLOCKS */
          switch (sd->state) {
          case sd_transfer_state:
-            stl_be_p(sd->data, sd->blk_written);
-            sd->state = sd_sendingdata_state;
-            sd->data_start = 0;
-            sd->data_offset = 0;
-            return sd_r1;
+            return sd_cmd_to_sendingdata(sd, req, 0,
+                                         &sd->blk_written,
+                                         sizeof(sd->blk_written));
default:
              break;
@@ -2138,6 +2136,7 @@ uint8_t sd_read_byte(SDState *sd)
      case 13: /* ACMD13: SD_STATUS */
      case 17: /* CMD17:  READ_SINGLE_BLOCK */
      case 19: /* CMD19:  SEND_TUNING_BLOCK (SD) */
+    case 22: /* ACMD22: SEND_NUM_WR_BLOCKS */
      case 30: /* CMD30:  SEND_WRITE_PROT */
      case 56: /* CMD56:  GEN_CMD */
          sd_generic_read_byte(sd, &ret);
@@ -2167,13 +2166,6 @@ uint8_t sd_read_byte(SDState *sd)
          }
          break;
- case 22: /* ACMD22: SEND_NUM_WR_BLOCKS */
-        ret = sd->data[sd->data_offset ++];
-
-        if (sd->data_offset >= 4)
-            sd->state = sd_transfer_state;
-        break;
-
      case 51:  /* ACMD51: SEND_SCR */
          ret = sd->scr[sd->data_offset ++];




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]