qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/18] hw/arm/smmu: Support nesting in the rest of com


From: Mostafa Saleh
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/18] hw/arm/smmu: Support nesting in the rest of commands
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:58:42 +0000

Hi Eric,

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 12:24:22PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Mostafa,
> 
> On 4/29/24 05:23, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > Some commands need rework for nesting, as they used to assume S1
> > and S2 are mutually exclusive:
> >
> > - CMD_TLBI_NH_ASID: Consider VMID if stage-2 is supported
> > - CMD_TLBI_NH_ALL: Consider VMID if stage-2 is supported, otherwise
> >   invalidate everything, this required a new vmid invalidation
> >   function for stage-1 only (ASID >= 0)
> >
> > Also, rework trace events to reflect the new implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/smmu-common.c         | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  hw/arm/smmuv3.c              | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  hw/arm/trace-events          |  6 ++++--
> >  include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h |  3 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> > index fa2460cf64..3ed0be05ef 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> > @@ -147,13 +147,14 @@ void smmu_iotlb_inv_all(SMMUState *s)
> >      g_hash_table_remove_all(s->iotlb);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_asid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> > -                                         gpointer user_data)
> > +static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_vmid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> > +                                              gpointer user_data)
> Can't you introduce
> 
> smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_vmid() separately and replace the 
> smmu_iotlb_inv_asid() call in SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ASID.
> Then you could focus on "if stage2 is supported" enhancements in this patch.
> 

Sure, will do.

Thanks,
Mostafa
> >  {
> > -    int asid = *(int *)user_data;
> > +    SMMUIOTLBPageInvInfo *info = (SMMUIOTLBPageInvInfo *)user_data;
> >      SMMUIOTLBKey *iotlb_key = (SMMUIOTLBKey *)key;
> >  
> > -    return SMMU_IOTLB_ASID(*iotlb_key) == asid;
> > +    return (SMMU_IOTLB_ASID(*iotlb_key) == info->asid) &&
> > +           (SMMU_IOTLB_VMID(*iotlb_key) == info->vmid);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> > @@ -165,6 +166,16 @@ static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid(gpointer key, 
> > gpointer value,
> >      return SMMU_IOTLB_VMID(*iotlb_key) == vmid;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid_s1(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> > +                                            gpointer user_data)
> > +{
> > +    int vmid = *(int *)user_data;
> > +    SMMUIOTLBKey *iotlb_key = (SMMUIOTLBKey *)key;
> > +
> > +    return (SMMU_IOTLB_VMID(*iotlb_key) == vmid) &&
> > +           (SMMU_IOTLB_ASID(*iotlb_key) >= 0);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_vmid_iova(gpointer key, gpointer 
> > value,
> >                                                gpointer user_data)
> >  {
> > @@ -258,10 +269,15 @@ void smmu_iotlb_inv_ipa(SMMUState *s, int vmid, 
> > dma_addr_t ipa, uint8_t tg,
> >                                  &info);
> >  }
> >  
> > -void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, int asid)
> > +void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid_vmid(SMMUState *s, int asid, int vmid)
> >  {
> > -    trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(asid);
> > -    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_asid, &asid);
> > +    SMMUIOTLBPageInvInfo info = {
> > +        .asid = asid,
> > +        .vmid = vmid,
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_asid_vmid(asid, vmid);
> > +    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_vmid, 
> > &info);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(SMMUState *s, int vmid)
> > @@ -270,6 +286,12 @@ void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(SMMUState *s, int vmid)
> >      g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid, &vmid);
> >  }
> >  
> > +inline void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid_s1(SMMUState *s, int vmid)
> > +{
> > +    trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid_s1(vmid);
> > +    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid_s1, 
> > &vmid);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* VMSAv8-64 Translation */
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> > index 82d918d9b5..e0fd494646 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> > @@ -1303,25 +1303,52 @@ static int smmuv3_cmdq_consume(SMMUv3State *s)
> >          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ASID:
> >          {
> >              int asid = CMD_ASID(&cmd);
> > +            int vmid = -1;
> >  
> >              if (!STAGE1_SUPPORTED(s)) {
> >                  cmd_error = SMMU_CERROR_ILL;
> >                  break;
> >              }
> >  
> > +            /*
> > +             * VMID is only matched when stage 2 is supported for the 
> > Security
> > +             * state corresponding to the command queue that the command 
> > was
> > +             * issued in.
> > +             * QEMU ignores the field by setting to -1, similarly to what 
> > STE
> > +             * decoding does. And invalidation commands ignore VMID < 0.
> > +             */
> > +            if (STAGE2_SUPPORTED(s)) {
> > +                vmid = CMD_VMID(&cmd);
> > +            }
> > +
> >              trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_asid(asid);
> >              smmu_inv_notifiers_all(&s->smmu_state);
> > -            smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(bs, asid);
> > +            smmu_iotlb_inv_asid_vmid(bs, asid, vmid);
> >              break;
> >          }
> >          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ALL:
> > +        {
> > +            int vmid = -1;
> > +
> >              if (!STAGE1_SUPPORTED(s)) {
> >                  cmd_error = SMMU_CERROR_ILL;
> >                  break;
> >              }
> > +
> > +            /*
> > +             * If stage-2 is supported, invalidate for this VMID only, 
> > otherwise
> > +             * invalidate the whole thing, see SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ASID()
> > +             */
> > +            if (STAGE2_SUPPORTED(s)) {
> > +                vmid = CMD_VMID(&cmd);
> > +                trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh(vmid);
> > +                smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid_s1(bs, vmid);
> > +                break;
> > +            }
> >              QEMU_FALLTHROUGH;
> > +        }
> >          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NSNH_ALL:
> > -            trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh();
> > +            trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nsnh();
> >              smmu_inv_notifiers_all(&s->smmu_state);
> >              smmu_iotlb_inv_all(bs);
> >              break;
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/trace-events b/hw/arm/trace-events
> > index 7d9c1703da..593cc571da 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/trace-events
> > +++ b/hw/arm/trace-events
> > @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ smmu_ptw_page_pte(int stage, int level,  uint64_t iova, 
> > uint64_t baseaddr, uint6
> >  smmu_ptw_block_pte(int stage, int level, uint64_t baseaddr, uint64_t 
> > pteaddr, uint64_t pte, uint64_t iova, uint64_t gpa, int bsize_mb) "stage=%d 
> > level=%d base@=0x%"PRIx64" pte@=0x%"PRIx64" pte=0x%"PRIx64" 
> > iova=0x%"PRIx64" block address = 0x%"PRIx64" block size = %d MiB"
> >  smmu_get_pte(uint64_t baseaddr, int index, uint64_t pteaddr, uint64_t pte) 
> > "baseaddr=0x%"PRIx64" index=0x%x, pteaddr=0x%"PRIx64", pte=0x%"PRIx64
> >  smmu_iotlb_inv_all(void) "IOTLB invalidate all"
> > -smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(int asid) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d"
> > +smmu_iotlb_inv_asid_vmid(int asid, int vmid) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d 
> > vmid=%d"
> >  smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(int vmid) "IOTLB invalidate vmid=%d"
> > +smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid_s1(int vmid) "IOTLB invalidate vmid=%d"
> >  smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(int asid, uint64_t addr) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d 
> > addr=0x%"PRIx64
> >  smmu_inv_notifiers_mr(const char *name) "iommu mr=%s"
> >  smmu_iotlb_lookup_hit(int asid, int vmid, uint64_t addr, uint32_t hit, 
> > uint32_t miss, uint32_t p) "IOTLB cache HIT asid=%d vmid=%d 
> > addr=0x%"PRIx64" hit=%d miss=%d hit rate=%d"
> > @@ -47,7 +48,8 @@ smmuv3_cmdq_cfgi_cd(uint32_t sid) "sid=0x%x"
> >  smmuv3_config_cache_hit(uint32_t sid, uint32_t hits, uint32_t misses, 
> > uint32_t perc) "Config cache HIT for sid=0x%x (hits=%d, misses=%d, hit 
> > rate=%d)"
> >  smmuv3_config_cache_miss(uint32_t sid, uint32_t hits, uint32_t misses, 
> > uint32_t perc) "Config cache MISS for sid=0x%x (hits=%d, misses=%d, hit 
> > rate=%d)"
> >  smmuv3_range_inval(int vmid, int asid, uint64_t addr, uint8_t tg, uint64_t 
> > num_pages, uint8_t ttl, bool leaf, int stage) "vmid=%d asid=%d 
> > addr=0x%"PRIx64" tg=%d num_pages=0x%"PRIx64" ttl=%d leaf=%d stage=%d"
> > -smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh(void) ""
> > +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh(int vmid) "vmid=%d"
> > +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nsnh(void) ""
> >  smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_asid(int asid) "asid=%d"
> >  smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_s12_vmid(int vmid) "vmid=%d"
> >  smmuv3_config_cache_inv(uint32_t sid) "Config cache INV for sid=0x%x"
> > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> > index de032fdfd1..361e639630 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> > @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ void smmu_iotlb_insert(SMMUState *bs, SMMUTransCfg 
> > *cfg, SMMUTLBEntry *entry);
> >  SMMUIOTLBKey smmu_get_iotlb_key(int asid, int vmid, uint64_t iova,
> >                                  uint8_t tg, uint8_t level);
> >  void smmu_iotlb_inv_all(SMMUState *s);
> > -void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, int asid);
> > +void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid_vmid(SMMUState *s, int asid, int vmid);
> >  void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(SMMUState *s, int vmid);
> > +void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid_s1(SMMUState *s, int vmid);
> >  void smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(SMMUState *s, int asid, int vmid, dma_addr_t iova,
> >                           uint8_t tg, uint64_t num_pages, uint8_t ttl);
> >  void smmu_iotlb_inv_ipa(SMMUState *s, int vmid, dma_addr_t ipa, uint8_t tg,
> Otherwise looks good to me
> 
> Eric
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]