qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 13/14] hw/i386: remove obsolete manual deprecation reason str


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] hw/i386: remove obsolete manual deprecation reason string of i440fx machines
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 13:15:44 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09)

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 02:08:58PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/05/2024 20.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The automatic deprecation mechanism introduced in the preceeding patches
> > will mark every i440fx machine upto and including 2.12 as deprecated. As
> > such we can revert the manually added deprecation which was a subset:
> > 
> >    commit c7437f0ddb8ee45bf96d949ddfcbb7697ae3d415
> >    Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >    Date:   Fri Oct 6 09:52:47 2023 +0200
> > 
> >      docs/about: Mark the old pc-i440fx-2.0 - 2.3 machine types as 
> > deprecated
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 1 -
> >   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> > index 9f92504cc4..4137e03f6f 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> > @@ -812,7 +812,6 @@ static void pc_i440fx_machine_2_3_options(MachineClass 
> > *m)
> >   {
> >       pc_i440fx_machine_2_4_options(m);
> >       m->hw_version = "2.3.0";
> > -    m->deprecation_reason = "old and unattended - use a newer version 
> > instead";
> >       compat_props_add(m->compat_props, hw_compat_2_3, hw_compat_2_3_len);
> >       compat_props_add(m->compat_props, pc_compat_2_3, pc_compat_2_3_len);
> >   }
> 
> This will conflict with Philippe's "hw/i386: Remove deprecated pc-i440fx-2.0
> -> 2.3 machines" patch series (which should easy to resolve, though).

Yep, there are a few places in my series which will conflict with
that.

I've just looked at Philippe's code and everything has at least
one R-b. I had a minor comment but I could address that in this
series.

IOW, ideally we could merge Philippe's series now, to reduce
code in flight touching the same areas.

> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]