[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 23/23] migration/multifd: Optimize sender side to be lockl
From: |
Fabiano Rosas |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 23/23] migration/multifd: Optimize sender side to be lockless |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:34:08 -0300 |
peterx@redhat.com writes:
> From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>
> When reviewing my attempt to refactor send_prepare(), Fabiano suggested we
> try out with dropping the mutex in multifd code [1].
>
> I thought about that before but I never tried to change the code. Now
> maybe it's time to give it a stab. This only optimizes the sender side.
>
> The trick here is multifd has a clear provider/consumer model, that the
> migration main thread publishes requests (either pending_job/pending_sync),
> while the multifd sender threads are consumers. Here we don't have a lot
> of comlicated data sharing, and the jobs can logically be submitted lockless.
complicated
>
> Arm the code with atomic weapons. Two things worth mentioning:
>
> - For multifd_send_pages(): we can use qatomic_load_acquire() when trying
> to find a free channel, but that's expensive if we attach one ACQUIRE per
> channel. Instead, make it atomic_read() on the pending_job flag, but
s/make it/keep it/
The diff doesn't show the atomic_read already there so it's confusing.
> merge the ACQUIRE into one single smp_mb_acquire() later.
>
> - For pending_sync: it doesn't have any extra data required since now
> p->flags are never touched, it should be safe to not use memory barrier.
> That's different from pending_sync.
pending_job?
>
> Provide rich comments for all the lockless operations to state how they are
> paired. With that, we can remove the mutex.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o7d1jlu5.fsf@suse.de
>
> Suggested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/multifd.h | 2 --
> migration/multifd.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.h b/migration/multifd.h
> index 98876ff94a..78a2317263 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.h
> +++ b/migration/multifd.h
> @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ typedef struct {
> /* syncs main thread and channels */
> QemuSemaphore sem_sync;
>
> - /* this mutex protects the following parameters */
> - QemuMutex mutex;
> /* is this channel thread running */
> bool running;
> /* multifd flags for each packet */
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> index b317d57d61..ef13e2e781 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> @@ -501,19 +501,19 @@ static bool multifd_send_pages(void)
> }
> }
>
> - qemu_mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
> - assert(!p->pages->num);
> - assert(!p->pages->block);
> /*
> - * Double check on pending_job==false with the lock. In the future if
> - * we can have >1 requester thread, we can replace this with a "goto
> - * retry", but that is for later.
> + * Make sure we read p->pending_job before all the rest. Pairs with
> + * qatomic_store_release() in multifd_send_thread().
> */
> - assert(qatomic_read(&p->pending_job) == false);
> - qatomic_set(&p->pending_job, true);
> + smp_mb_acquire();
> + assert(!p->pages->num);
> multifd_send_state->pages = p->pages;
> p->pages = pages;
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> + /*
> + * Making sure p->pages is setup before marking pending_job=true. Pairs
> + * with the qatomic_load_acquire() in multifd_send_thread().
> + */
> + qatomic_store_release(&p->pending_job, true);
> qemu_sem_post(&p->sem);
>
> return true;
> @@ -648,7 +648,6 @@ static bool
> multifd_send_cleanup_channel(MultiFDSendParams *p, Error **errp)
> }
> multifd_send_channel_destroy(p->c);
> p->c = NULL;
> - qemu_mutex_destroy(&p->mutex);
> qemu_sem_destroy(&p->sem);
> qemu_sem_destroy(&p->sem_sync);
> g_free(p->name);
> @@ -742,14 +741,12 @@ int multifd_send_sync_main(void)
>
> trace_multifd_send_sync_main_signal(p->id);
>
> - qemu_mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
> /*
> * We should be the only user so far, so not possible to be set by
> * others concurrently.
> */
> assert(qatomic_read(&p->pending_sync) == false);
> qatomic_set(&p->pending_sync, true);
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> qemu_sem_post(&p->sem);
> }
> for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
> @@ -796,9 +793,12 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque)
> if (multifd_send_should_exit()) {
> break;
> }
> - qemu_mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
>
> - if (qatomic_read(&p->pending_job)) {
> + /*
> + * Read pending_job flag before p->pages. Pairs with the
> + * qatomic_store_release() in multifd_send_pages().
> + */
> + if (qatomic_load_acquire(&p->pending_job)) {
> MultiFDPages_t *pages = p->pages;
>
> p->iovs_num = 0;
> @@ -806,14 +806,12 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque)
>
> ret = multifd_send_state->ops->send_prepare(p, &local_err);
> if (ret != 0) {
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> break;
> }
>
> ret = qio_channel_writev_full_all(p->c, p->iov, p->iovs_num,
> NULL,
> 0, p->write_flags, &local_err);
> if (ret != 0) {
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -822,24 +820,31 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque)
>
> multifd_pages_reset(p->pages);
> p->next_packet_size = 0;
> - qatomic_set(&p->pending_job, false);
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> +
> + /*
> + * Making sure p->pages is published before saying "we're
> + * free". Pairs with the qatomic_load_acquire() in
smp_mb_acquire()
> + * multifd_send_pages().
> + */
> + qatomic_store_release(&p->pending_job, false);
> } else {
> - /* If not a normal job, must be a sync request */
> + /*
> + * If not a normal job, must be a sync request. Note that
> + * pending_sync is a standalone flag (unlike pending_job), so
> + * it doesn't require explicit memory barriers.
> + */
> assert(qatomic_read(&p->pending_sync));
> p->flags = MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC;
> multifd_send_fill_packet(p);
> ret = qio_channel_write_all(p->c, (void *)p->packet,
> p->packet_len, &local_err);
> if (ret != 0) {
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> break;
> }
> /* p->next_packet_size will always be zero for a SYNC packet */
> stat64_add(&mig_stats.multifd_bytes, p->packet_len);
> p->flags = 0;
> qatomic_set(&p->pending_sync, false);
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
> }
> }
> @@ -853,10 +858,7 @@ out:
> error_free(local_err);
> }
>
> - qemu_mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
> p->running = false;
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> -
> rcu_unregister_thread();
> migration_threads_remove(thread);
> trace_multifd_send_thread_end(p->id, p->packets_sent,
> p->total_normal_pages);
> @@ -998,7 +1000,6 @@ int multifd_send_setup(Error **errp)
> for (i = 0; i < thread_count; i++) {
> MultiFDSendParams *p = &multifd_send_state->params[i];
>
> - qemu_mutex_init(&p->mutex);
> qemu_sem_init(&p->sem, 0);
> qemu_sem_init(&p->sem_sync, 0);
> p->id = i;
- Re: [PATCH v2 19/23] migration/multifd: Cleanup multifd_save_cleanup(), (continued)
Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] migration/multifd: Refactor ->send_prepare() and cleanups, Peter Xu, 2024/02/05