[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1 |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 2024 17:08:22 +0000 |
On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 16:45:30 +0000
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:00:56 +0000
> > Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 15:17, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> >> > > So, that looks like:
> >> > > * we call cpu_tb_exec(), which executes some generated code
> >> > > * that generated code calls the lookup_tb_ptr helper to see
> >> > > if we have a generated TB already for the address we're going
> >> > > to execute next
> >> > > * lookup_tb_ptr probes the TLB to see if we know the host RAM
> >> > > address for the guest address
> >> > > * this results in a TLB walk for an instruction fetch
> >> > > * the page table descriptor load is to IO memory
> >> > > * io_prepare assumes it needs to do a TLB recompile, because
> >> > > can_do_io is clear
> >> > >
> >> > > I am not surprised that the corner case of "the guest put its
> >> > > page tables in an MMIO device" has not yet come up :-)
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm really not sure how the icount handling should interact
> >> > > with that...
> >> >
> >> > Its not just icount - we need to handle it for all modes now. That said
> >> > seeing as we are at the end of a block shouldn't can_do_io be set?
> >>
> >> The lookup_tb_ptr helper gets called from tcg_gen_goto_tb(),
> >> which happens earlier than the tb_stop callback (it can
> >> happen in the trans function for branch etc insns, for
> >> example).
> >>
> >> I think it should be OK to clear can_do_io at the start
> >> of the lookup_tb_ptr helper, something like:
> >> diff --git a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
> >> index 977576ca143..7818537f318 100644
> >> --- a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
> >> +++ b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
> >> @@ -396,6 +396,15 @@ const void *HELPER(lookup_tb_ptr)(CPUArchState *env)
> >> uint64_t cs_base;
> >> uint32_t flags, cflags;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * By definition we've just finished a TB, so I/O is OK.
> >> + * Avoid the possibility of calling cpu_io_recompile() if
> >> + * a page table walk triggered by tb_lookup() calling
> >> + * probe_access_internal() happens to touch an MMIO device.
> >> + * The next TB, if we chain to it, will clear the flag again.
> >> + */
> >> + cpu->neg.can_do_io = true;
> >> +
> >> cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, &pc, &cs_base, &flags);
> >>
> >> cflags = curr_cflags(cpu);
> >>
> >> -- PMM
> >
> > No joy. Seems like a very similar backtrace.
> >
> > Thread 5 "qemu-system-x86" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> > [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff4efe6c0 (LWP 23937)]
> > __pthread_kill_implementation (no_tid=0, signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>)
> > at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44
> > 44 ./nptl/pthread_kill.c: No such file or directory.
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (no_tid=0, signo=6, threadid=<optimized
> > out>) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44
> > #1 __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at
> > ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78
> > #2 __GI___pthread_kill (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6) at
> > ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89
> > #3 0x00007ffff77c43b6 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at
> > ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
> > #4 0x00007ffff77aa87c in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79
> > #5 0x0000555555c4d19e in cpu_abort (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > fmt=fmt@entry=0x555556048ee8 "cpu_io_recompile: could not find TB for
> > pc=%p") at ../../cpu-target.c:373
> > #6 0x0000555555c9cb25 in cpu_io_recompile (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > retaddr=retaddr@entry=0) at ../../accel/tcg/translate-all.c:611
> > #7 0x0000555555c9f744 in io_prepare (retaddr=0, addr=19595790664,
> > attrs=..., xlat=<optimized out>, cpu=0x5555578e0cb0, out_offset=<synthetic
> > pointer>) at ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1339
> > #8 do_ld_mmio_beN (cpu=0x5555578e0cb0, full=0x7ffe88012890,
> > ret_be=ret_be@entry=0, addr=19595790664, size=size@entry=8, mmu_idx=4,
> > type=MMU_DATA_LOAD, ra=0) at ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:2030
> > #9 0x0000555555ca0ecd in do_ld_8 (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > p=p@entry=0x7ffff4efcdd0, mmu_idx=<optimized out>,
> > type=type@entry=MMU_DATA_LOAD, memop=<optimized out>, ra=ra@entry=0) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:2356
> > #10 0x0000555555ca332f in do_ld8_mmu (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > addr=addr@entry=19595790664, oi=oi@entry=52, ra=ra@entry=0,
> > access_type=access_type@entry=MMU_DATA_LOAD) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:2439
> > #11 0x0000555555ca5e69 in cpu_ldq_mmu (ra=0, oi=52, addr=19595790664,
> > env=0x5555578e3470) at ../../accel/tcg/ldst_common.c.inc:169
> > #12 cpu_ldq_le_mmuidx_ra (env=0x5555578e3470, addr=19595790664,
> > mmu_idx=<optimized out>, ra=ra@entry=0) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/ldst_common.c.inc:301
> > #13 0x0000555555b4b5de in ptw_ldq (in=0x7ffff4efcf10) at
> > ../../target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c:98
> > #14 ptw_ldq (in=0x7ffff4efcf10) at
> > ../../target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c:93
> > #15 mmu_translate (env=env@entry=0x5555578e3470, in=0x7ffff4efcfd0,
> > out=0x7ffff4efcfa0, err=err@entry=0x7ffff4efcfb0) at
> > ../../target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c:173
> > #16 0x0000555555b4c3f3 in get_physical_address (err=0x7ffff4efcfb0,
> > out=0x7ffff4efcfa0, mmu_idx=0, access_type=MMU_DATA_STORE,
> > addr=18386491786698339392, env=0x5555578e3470) at
> > ../../target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c:578
> > #17 x86_cpu_tlb_fill (cs=0x5555578e0cb0, addr=18386491786698339392,
> > size=<optimized out>, access_type=MMU_DATA_STORE, mmu_idx=0,
> > probe=<optimized out>, retaddr=140736029817822) at
> > ../../target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c:604
> > #18 0x0000555555ca0df9 in tlb_fill (retaddr=140736029817822, mmu_idx=0,
> > access_type=MMU_DATA_STORE, size=<optimized out>,
> > addr=18386491786698339392, cpu=0x7ffff4efd120) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1315
> > #19 mmu_lookup1 (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > data=data@entry=0x7ffff4efd120, mmu_idx=0,
> > access_type=access_type@entry=MMU_DATA_STORE, ra=ra@entry=140736029817822)
> > at ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1713
> > #20 0x0000555555ca2b71 in mmu_lookup (cpu=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > addr=18386491786698339392, oi=<optimized out>, ra=140736029817822,
> > type=MMU_DATA_STORE, l=0x7ffff4efd120) at ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1803
> > #21 0x0000555555ca3e5d in do_st8_mmu (cpu=0x5555578e0cb0, addr=23937,
> > val=18386491784638059520, oi=6, ra=140736029817822) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/cputlb.c:2853
> > #22 0x00007fffa9107c63 in code_gen_buffer ()
>
> No thats different - we are actually writing to the MMIO region here.
> But the fact we hit cpu_abort because we can't find the TB we are
> executing is a little problematic.
>
> Does ra properly point to the code buffer here?
Err. How would I tell?
I'll confess I have almost no idea what is going on in TCG :(
Can learn but it won't be quick.
J
>
> > #23 0x0000555555c9395b in cpu_tb_exec (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > itb=itb@entry=0x7fffa9107980 <code_gen_buffer+17856851>,
> > tb_exit=tb_exit@entry=0x7ffff4efd718) at ../../accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:442
> > #24 0x0000555555c93ec0 in cpu_loop_exec_tb (tb_exit=0x7ffff4efd718,
> > last_tb=<synthetic pointer>, pc=<optimized out>, tb=0x7fffa9107980
> > <code_gen_buffer+17856851>, cpu=0x5555578e0cb0) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:897
> > #25 cpu_exec_loop (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > sc=sc@entry=0x7ffff4efd7b0) at ../../accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:1012
> > #26 0x0000555555c946d1 in cpu_exec_setjmp (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0,
> > sc=sc@entry=0x7ffff4efd7b0) at ../../accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:1029
> > #27 0x0000555555c94ebc in cpu_exec (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c:1055
> > #28 0x0000555555cb8f53 in tcg_cpu_exec (cpu=cpu@entry=0x5555578e0cb0) at
> > ../../accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops.c:76
> > #29 0x0000555555cb90b0 in mttcg_cpu_thread_fn
> > (arg=arg@entry=0x5555578e0cb0) at ../../accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops-mttcg.c:95
> > #30 0x0000555555e57180 in qemu_thread_start (args=0x555557956000) at
> > ../../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:541
> > #31 0x00007ffff78176ba in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at
> > ./nptl/pthread_create.c:444
> > #32 0x00007ffff78a60d0 in clone3 () at
> > ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:81
>
- Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Alex Bennée, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Alex Bennée, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1,
Jonathan Cameron <=
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Alex Bennée, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Gregory Price, 2024/02/01
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/02
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/02
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Gregory Price, 2024/02/02
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/02
- Re: Crash with CXL + TCG on 8.2: Was Re: qemu cxl memory expander shows numa_node -1, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/02/07