Re: [PATCH v2] block/blkio: Make s->mem_region_alignment be 64 bits

[Michael Tokarev]

30.01.2024 15:20, Richard W.M. Jones :
> With GCC 14 the code failed to compile on i686 (and was wrong for any
> version of GCC):
>
> ../block/blkio.c: In function ‘blkio_file_open’:
> ../block/blkio.c:857:28: error: passing argument 3 of ‘blkio_get_uint64’ from 
> incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>    857 |                            &s->mem_region_alignment);
>        |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>        |                            |
>        |                            size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> In file included from ../block/blkio.c:12:
> /usr/include/blkio.h:49:67: note: expected ‘uint64_t *’ {aka ‘long long 
> unsigned int *’} but argument is of type ‘size_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’}
>     49 | int blkio_get_uint64(struct blkio *b, const char *name, uint64_t 
> *value);
>        |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
> ---
>   block/blkio.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blkio.c b/block/blkio.c
> index 0a0a6c0f5fd..bc2f21784c7 100644
> --- a/block/blkio.c
> +++ b/block/blkio.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ typedef struct {
>       CoQueue bounce_available;
>   
>       /* The value of the "mem-region-alignment" property */
> -    size_t mem_region_alignment;
> +    uint64_t mem_region_alignment;

This seems like a stable material, is it not?

It's interesting gcc didn't warn about this one before, while it is
clearly a type mismatch..

/mjt