qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/88] esp: rework ESP emulation to use a SCSI phase-based st


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/88] esp: rework ESP emulation to use a SCSI phase-based state machine
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:53:14 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 12/01/2024 13.52, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
The ESP SCSI chip fundamentally consists of a FIFO for transferring data to/from
the SCSI bus along with a command sequencer which automates various processes 
such
as selection, message/command transfer and data transfer. What makes this chip
particularly interesting is that the FIFO is also used as a buffer for DMA 
transfers
which makes it possible to mix and match DMA and non-DMA transfers when sending 
and
receiving data to/from the SCSI bus.

Whilst the current ESP emulation works well for most cases, there are several
problems that I've encountered whilst trying to debug various guest issues:


1) Multiple code paths for non-DMA, DMA and pDMA

Consider a SCSI request being submitted by the guest: if it is a DMA SCSI
request then it takes one path through get_cmd(), and a different path through
get_cmd() for pDMA. This then leads to the DMA code path being called for DMA
and the pDMA codepath being called for each FIFO write. Finally once you add
in the non-DMA path you end up with a total of 5 potential codepaths for any
given SCSI request.

2) Manual handling of STAT_TC flag

According to the datasheet the STAT_TC flag in ESP_RSTAT is set when the DMA
transfer counter reaches zero. The current code handles this manually in
multiple places, including where it shouldn't be necessary.

3) Deferred interrupts are used only for reads and not writes

The ESP emulation currently makes use of a deferred interrupt when submitting
read commands i.e. the interrupt flags are not updated immediately but when
the QEMU SCSI layer indicates it is ready. This works well for reads, but isn't
implemented for writes which can cause problems when the host is heavily loaded
or a large SCSI write is requested.

4) Padding of pDMA TI transfers to a minimum of 16 bytes

In order to allow Classic MacOS to boot successfully there is a workaround that
pads all pDMA TI transfers to a minimum of 16 bytes (see commit 7aa6baee7c
"esp: add support for unaligned accesses"). This feature is not documented and 
it
turns out that this is a symptom of incorrect handling of transfer
overflow/underflow conditions.

5) Duplication of some non-DMA logic in esp_reg_read() and esp_reg_write()

When reading and writing to the FIFO there is some duplication of logic from
esp_do_nodma() in esp_reg_read() and esp_reg_write(). This should be eliminated
in favour of a single state machine for handling non-DMA FIFO accesses in a
single place.


The series here reworks the ESP emulation to use a SCSI phase-based state 
machine
with just two paths: one for DMA/pDMA requests, and another for non-DMA 
requests.
The pDMA callbacks are completely removed so that there is now only a single 
path
for DMA requests. As part of this work the manual STAT_TC handling is removed, 
and a
couple of bugs in the SCSI phase selection are fixed to allow proper transfer
underflow/overflow detection and recovery.

I've tested the series with all of my available ESP images and compatibility is
greatly improved with these changes: I believe that this series should also fix 
a
few GitLab issues including https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1831,
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/611 and
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1127. In addition it allows 
Aurelien's
really old SPARC Linux images to boot once again, and also the NeXTCube machine 
can
now boot, load its kernel from disk and start to execute it.

FWIW, I did some sanity checking by installing an old Fedora 12 onto a SCSI disk attached to the am53c974 and dc390 controllers, and everything still works fine with your patches. Thus feel free to add:

Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]