qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH V2 11/11] vfio: allow cpr-reboot migration if suspended


From: Steven Sistare
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 11/11] vfio: allow cpr-reboot migration if suspended
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:37:33 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 1/15/2024 2:33 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 07:05:10AM -0800, Steve Sistare wrote:
>> Allow cpr-reboot for vfio if the guest is in the suspended runstate.  The
>> guest drivers' suspend methods flush outstanding requests and re-initialize
>> the devices, and thus there is no device state to save and restore.  The
>> user is responsible for suspending the guest before initiating cpr, such as
>> by issuing guest-suspend-ram to the qemu guest agent.
>>
>> Relax the vfio blocker so it does not apply to cpr, and add a notifier that
>> verifies the guest is suspended.  Skip dirty page tracking, which is N/A for
>> cpr, to avoid ioctl errors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/vfio/common.c              |  2 +-
>>  hw/vfio/cpr.c                 | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  hw/vfio/migration.c           |  2 +-
>>  include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h |  1 +
>>  migration/ram.c               |  9 +++++----
>>  5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
>> index 0b3352f..09af934 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
>> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int vfio_block_multiple_devices_migration(VFIODevice 
>> *vbasedev, Error **errp)
>>      error_setg(&multiple_devices_migration_blocker,
>>                 "Multiple VFIO devices migration is supported only if all of 
>> "
>>                 "them support P2P migration");
>> -    ret = migrate_add_blocker(&multiple_devices_migration_blocker, errp);
>> +    ret = migrate_add_blocker_normal(&multiple_devices_migration_blocker, 
>> errp);
>>  
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/cpr.c b/hw/vfio/cpr.c
>> index bbd1c7a..9f4b1fe 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/cpr.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/cpr.c
>> @@ -7,13 +7,33 @@
>>  
>>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>  #include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h"
>> +#include "migration/misc.h"
>>  #include "qapi/error.h"
>> +#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
>> +
>> +static int vfio_cpr_reboot_notifier(NotifierWithReturn *notifier,
>> +                                    MigrationEvent *e, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    if (e->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_SETUP &&
>> +        !runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SUSPENDED)) {
>> +
>> +        error_setg(errp,
>> +            "VFIO device only supports cpr-reboot for runstate suspended");
>> +
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
> 
> What happens if the guest is suspended during SETUP, but then quickly waked
> up before CPR migration completes?

That is a management layer bug -- we told them the VM must be suspended.
However, I will reject a wakeup request if migration is active and mode is cpr.

>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>>  
>>  int vfio_cpr_register_container(VFIOContainer *container, Error **errp)
>>  {
>> +    migration_add_notifier_mode(&container->cpr_reboot_notifier,
>> +                                vfio_cpr_reboot_notifier,
>> +                                MIG_MODE_CPR_REBOOT);
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  void vfio_cpr_unregister_container(VFIOContainer *container)
>>  {
>> +    migration_remove_notifier(&container->cpr_reboot_notifier);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/migration.c b/hw/vfio/migration.c
>> index 534fddf..488905d 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/migration.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/migration.c
>> @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static int vfio_block_migration(VFIODevice *vbasedev, 
>> Error *err, Error **errp)
>>      vbasedev->migration_blocker = error_copy(err);
>>      error_free(err);
>>  
>> -    return migrate_add_blocker(&vbasedev->migration_blocker, errp);
>> +    return migrate_add_blocker_normal(&vbasedev->migration_blocker, errp);
>>  }
>>  
>>  /* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> index 1add5b7..7a46e24 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct VFIOGroup;
>>  typedef struct VFIOContainer {
>>      VFIOContainerBase bcontainer;
>>      int fd; /* /dev/vfio/vfio, empowered by the attached groups */
>> +    NotifierWithReturn cpr_reboot_notifier;
>>      unsigned iommu_type;
>>      QLIST_HEAD(, VFIOGroup) group_list;
>>  } VFIOContainer;
>> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
>> index 1923366..44ad324 100644
>> --- a/migration/ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/ram.c
>> @@ -2392,8 +2392,8 @@ static void ram_save_cleanup(void *opaque)
>>      RAMState **rsp = opaque;
>>      RAMBlock *block;
>>  
>> -    /* We don't use dirty log with background snapshots */
>> -    if (!migrate_background_snapshot()) {
>> +    /* We don't use dirty log with background snapshots or cpr */
>> +    if (!migrate_background_snapshot() && migrate_mode() == 
>> MIG_MODE_NORMAL) {
> 
> Same question here, on what happens if the user resumes the VM before
> migration completes?  IIUC shared-ram is not required, then it means if
> that happens the cpr migration image can contain corrupted data, and that
> may be a problem.
> 
> Background snapshot is special in that it relies on totally different
> tracking facilities (userfault, rather than KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG), so it
> disabled dirty tracking completely.  I assume not the case for cpr.
> 
> If cpr is not going to support that use case, IIUC it should fail that
> system wakeup properly.  Or perhaps when CPR mode QEMU should instead
> reject a wakeup?

Good catch, this hunk would break the non-vfio case where the guest can be
running when migration is initiated.  I should narrow the logic to check for
that:

    if (!migrate_background_snapshot() &&
        (migrate_mode() == MIG_MODE_NORMAL || runstate_is_running()) {
        ... use dirty logging ...

That plus rejecting a wakeup request should be sufficient.

- Steve

>>          /* caller have hold BQL or is in a bh, so there is
>>           * no writing race against the migration bitmap
>>           */
>> @@ -2804,8 +2804,9 @@ static void ram_init_bitmaps(RAMState *rs)
>>  
>>      WITH_RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() {
>>          ram_list_init_bitmaps();
>> -        /* We don't use dirty log with background snapshots */
>> -        if (!migrate_background_snapshot()) {
>> +        /* We don't use dirty log with background snapshots or cpr */
>> +        if (!migrate_background_snapshot() &&
>> +            migrate_mode() == MIG_MODE_NORMAL) {
>>              memory_global_dirty_log_start(GLOBAL_DIRTY_MIGRATION);
>>              migration_bitmap_sync_precopy(rs, false);
>>          }
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]