|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/13] trans_rvv.c.inc: remove vlmax arg from vec_element_loadx() |
Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:16:52 +1100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 1/16/24 04:57, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
I am now wondering if this is worth the trouble, and we should instead do: + int vlmax = cpu->cfg.vlenb >> (s->sew - s->lmul); Like we're already doing in patch 9. Patch 12 would be a similar case.
This is more like what I expected to see. r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |