[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] target/s390x/kvm/pv: Provide some more useful information if
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] target/s390x/kvm/pv: Provide some more useful information if decryption fails |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:42:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25) |
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 03:30:38PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> It's a common scenario to copy guest images from one host to another
> to run the guest on the other machine. This (of course) does not work
> with "secure exection" guests since they are encrypted with one certain
> host key. However, if you still (accidentally) do it, you only get a
> very user-unfriendly error message that looks like this:
Not a comment on the patch, but my own interest how/where does the
disk image encryption/decryption happen ? Is that in guest kernel
context, and any info on what format the encryption uses ?
>
> qemu-system-s390x: KVM PV command 2 (KVM_PV_SET_SEC_PARMS) failed:
> header rc 108 rrc 5 IOCTL rc: -22
>
> Let's provide at least a somewhat nicer hint to the users so that they
> are able to figure out what might have gone wrong.
>
> Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-18212
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/kvm/pv.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c b/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c
> index 6a69be7e5c..2833a255fa 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/pv.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ static bool info_valid;
> static struct kvm_s390_pv_info_vm info_vm;
> static struct kvm_s390_pv_info_dump info_dump;
>
> -static int __s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, const char *cmdname, void *data)
> +static int __s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, const char *cmdname, void *data,
> + int *pvrc)
> {
> struct kvm_pv_cmd pv_cmd = {
> .cmd = cmd,
> @@ -46,6 +47,9 @@ static int __s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, const char *cmdname,
> void *data)
> "IOCTL rc: %d", cmd, cmdname, pv_cmd.rc, pv_cmd.rrc,
> rc);
> }
> + if (pvrc) {
> + *pvrc = pv_cmd.rc;
> + }
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -53,12 +57,13 @@ static int __s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, const char
> *cmdname, void *data)
> * This macro lets us pass the command as a string to the function so
> * we can print it on an error.
> */
> -#define s390_pv_cmd(cmd, data) __s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data)
> +#define s390_pv_cmd(cmd, data) __s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data, NULL)
> +#define s390_pv_cmd_pvrc(cmd, data, pvrc) __s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data,
> pvrc)
> #define s390_pv_cmd_exit(cmd, data) \
> { \
> int rc; \
> \
> - rc = __s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data);\
> + rc = __s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data, NULL); \
> if (rc) { \
> exit(1); \
> } \
> @@ -144,12 +149,19 @@ bool s390_pv_vm_try_disable_async(S390CcwMachineState
> *ms)
>
> int s390_pv_set_sec_parms(uint64_t origin, uint64_t length)
> {
> + int ret, pvrc;
> struct kvm_s390_pv_sec_parm args = {
> .origin = origin,
> .length = length,
> };
>
> - return s390_pv_cmd(KVM_PV_SET_SEC_PARMS, &args);
> + ret = s390_pv_cmd_pvrc(KVM_PV_SET_SEC_PARMS, &args, &pvrc);
> + if (ret && pvrc == 0x108) {
> + error_report("Can't set secure parameters, please check whether "
> + "the image is correctly encrypted for this host");
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|