qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 11/12] next-cube.c: replace sysmem with get_system_memory() i


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] next-cube.c: replace sysmem with get_system_memory() in next_cube_init()
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:43:16 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 16/12/2023 20:20, Thomas Huth wrote:

Am Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:00:08 +0000
schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>:

Removing the intermediate variable helps simplify the code in next_cube_init().

Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
---
  hw/m68k/next-cube.c | 14 +++++++-------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/m68k/next-cube.c b/hw/m68k/next-cube.c
index d9a1f234ec..73deef25ca 100644
--- a/hw/m68k/next-cube.c
+++ b/hw/m68k/next-cube.c
@@ -974,7 +974,6 @@ static void next_cube_init(MachineState *machine)
      MemoryRegion *dmamem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
      MemoryRegion *bmapm1 = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
      MemoryRegion *bmapm2 = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
-    MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
      const char *bios_name = machine->firmware ?: ROM_FILE;
      DeviceState *pcdev;
@@ -996,7 +995,8 @@ static void next_cube_init(MachineState *machine)
      sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(pcdev), &error_fatal);
/* 64MB RAM starting at 0x04000000 */
-    memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0x04000000, machine->ram);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0x04000000,
+                                machine->ram);
/* Framebuffer */
      sysbus_create_simple(TYPE_NEXTFB, 0x0B000000, NULL);
@@ -1010,19 +1010,19 @@ static void next_cube_init(MachineState *machine)
      /* BMAP memory */
      memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(bmapm1, NULL, "next.bmapmem", 64,
                                             RAM_SHARED, &error_fatal);
-    memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0x020c0000, bmapm1);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0x020c0000, bmapm1);
      /* The Rev_2.5_v66.bin firmware accesses it at 0x820c0020, too */
      memory_region_init_alias(bmapm2, NULL, "next.bmapmem2", bmapm1, 0x0, 64);
-    memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0x820c0000, bmapm2);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0x820c0000, bmapm2);
/* KBD */
      sysbus_create_simple(TYPE_NEXTKBD, 0x0200e000, NULL);
/* Load ROM here */
      memory_region_init_rom(rom, NULL, "next.rom", 0x20000, &error_fatal);
-    memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0x01000000, rom);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0x01000000, rom);
      memory_region_init_alias(rom2, NULL, "next.rom2", rom, 0x0, 0x20000);
-    memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0x0, rom2);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0x0, rom2);
      if (load_image_targphys(bios_name, 0x01000000, 0x20000) < 8) {
          if (!qtest_enabled()) {
              error_report("Failed to load firmware '%s'.", bios_name);
@@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ static void next_cube_init(MachineState *machine)
      /* DMA */
      memory_region_init_io(dmamem, NULL, &next_dma_ops, machine, "next.dma",
                            0x5000);
-    memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0x02000000, dmamem);
+    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0x02000000, dmamem);
  }

Mostly a matter of taste, but I'd prefer to keep it like it was before - I
dislike calling functions multiple times if one time is sufficient.

No problem, I can drop this patch from the series.


ATB,

Mark.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]