[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate
From: |
Fabiano Rosas |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Dec 2023 09:44:12 -0300 |
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 06:09:16PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Right, I got your point. I just think we could avoid designing this new
>> string format by creating new fields with the extra space:
>>
>> typedef struct QEMU_PACKED {
>> uint32_t size;
>> uint8_t runstate[50];
>> uint8_t unused[50];
>> RunState state;
>> bool received;
>> } GlobalState;
>>
>> In my mind this works seamlessly, or am I mistaken?
>
> I think what you proposed should indeed work.
>
> Currently it's:
>
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> VMSTATE_UINT32(size, GlobalState),
> VMSTATE_BUFFER(runstate, GlobalState),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> },
>
> I had a quick look at vmstate_info_buffer, it mostly only get()/put() those
> buffers with its sizeof(), so looks all fine. For sure in all cases we'd
> better test it to verify.
>
> One side note is since we so far use qapi_enum_parse() for the runstate, I
> think the "size" is not ever used..
>
> If we do want a split, IMHO we can consider making runstate[] even smaller
> to just free up the rest spaces all in one shot:
>
> typedef struct QEMU_PACKED {
> uint32_t size;
> /*
> * Assuming 16 is good enough to fit all possible runstate strings..
> * This field must be a string ending with '\0'.
> */
> uint8_t runstate[16];
> /* 0x00 when QEMU doesn't support it, or "0"/"1" to reflect its state */
> uint8_t vm_was_suspended[1];
> /*
> * Still free of use space. Note that we only have 99 bytes for use
> * because the last byte (the 100th byte) must be zero due to legacy
> * reasons, if not it may be set to zero after loaded on dest QEMU.
> */
I'd add a 'uint8_t reserved;' to go along with this comment instead of
leaving a hole.
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Steven Sistare, 2023/12/01
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Peter Xu, 2023/12/04
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/12/04
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Peter Xu, 2023/12/04
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/12/04
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Peter Xu, 2023/12/04
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate,
Fabiano Rosas <=
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Steven Sistare, 2023/12/05
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Peter Xu, 2023/12/05
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/12/05
- Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Steven Sistare, 2023/12/05
Re: [PATCH V6 05/14] migration: propagate suspended runstate, Steven Sistare, 2023/12/04