[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC 1/3] scripts/checkpatch: Check common spelling be default
From: |
Zhao Liu |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC 1/3] scripts/checkpatch: Check common spelling be default |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:24:50 +0800 |
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:07:12 +0100
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] scripts/checkpatch: Check common spelling be default
>
> On 04/12/2023 09.29, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > Add the check for common spelling mistakes for QEMU, which stole
> > selling.txt from Linux kernel and referenced the Linux kernel's
>
> You need to sellcheck^Wspellcheck the above line ;-)
Oh no, I didn't expect this place to be wrong...--codespelling isn't
infallible!
>
> > implementation in checkpatch.pl.
> >
> > This check covers common spelling mistakes, and can be updated/
> > extended as per QEMU's realities.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 44 ++
> > scripts/spelling.txt | 1713 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 1757 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 scripts/spelling.txt
>
> I like the idea of having spellchecking in checkpatch.pl
Thanks!
> ... not sure though
> if we need both, this patch and support for codespell. If you ask me, I'd
> just go with the next codespell patch and avoid adding a full spelling.txt
> file here ... but if others like this patch here, too, I'm also fine with
> it.
OK, I'll wait a few days to see if anyone else has any comments, if not
I'll refresh a V2 and just keep the next patch.
Regards,
Zhao