|
From: | Akihiko Odaki |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] pcie: Fix ARI next function numbers |
Date: | Mon, 3 Jul 2023 13:54:40 +0900 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 |
On 2023/07/03 13:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:17:16PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:On 2023/07/02 21:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:02:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF. The PF should end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0. Supersedes: <20230701070133.24877-1-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> ("[PATCH 0/4] pci: Compare function number and ARI next function number")Thanks! How was this patch tested?I brought VFs up with igb and performed link up for a fresh VM and a VM migrated from 8.0.2.Which guest?
I use Fedora 38.
V2 -> V3: Moved the logic to PCI common infrastucture (Michael S. Tsirkin) V1 -> V2: Fixed migration. (Michael S. Tsirkin) Added a caveat comment. (Michael S. Tsirkin) Akihiko Odaki (2): pcie: Use common ARI next function number pcie: Specify 0 for ARI next function numbers docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 4 ++-- include/hw/pci/pci.h | 2 ++ include/hw/pci/pcie.h | 2 +- hw/core/machine.c | 1 + hw/net/igb.c | 2 +- hw/net/igbvf.c | 2 +- hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 2 +- hw/pci/pci.c | 2 ++ hw/pci/pcie.c | 4 +++- 9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.41.0
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |