[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2023 09:33:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) |
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:31:00AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:28 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > I wonder if we should take this a step further and rename
> > > qemu-system-x86_64
> > > to qemu-system-x86! Distros can if they wish create symlinks to both
> > > qemu-system-i386 and qemu-system-x86_64.
> >
> > I can't help feeling this just creates a new upgrade burden for distros
> > for no obvious win.
>
> We can create the symlinks on install as well during the deprecation
> period. It doesn't have to be done by distros.
What's the actual win though ? Why would anyone want to create guests
using qemu-system-x86, if both qemu-system-i386 / qemu-system-x86_64
still exist indefinitely for backwards compat. What does having a
qemu-system-x86 add that can't be achieve just though hardlink
between the two existing binaries ?
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|