qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] hw/pci-bridge: pci_expander_bridge: Fix wrong type and r


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hw/pci-bridge: pci_expander_bridge: Fix wrong type and rework inheritance.
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 14:45:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0

On 21/04/2023 14.19, Jonathan Cameron via wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:59:57 +0100
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 09:19, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Peter Maydell highlighted an incorrect conversion to TYPE_PXB_DEVICE from
a device that didn't have that a an ancestor type. PXB_DEV() used instead of
PXB_CXL_DEV()/

CAFEAcA-+de+eeLCE4YsAw1O-Qyd_4W1Ra05mGDsU_-3a6d92qw@mail.gmail.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAFEAcA-+de+eeLCE4YsAw1O-Qyd_4W1Ra05mGDsU_-3a6d92qw@mail.gmail.com/

During the discussion it became clear that the inheritance of the various
TYPE_PXB*_DEVICE was unusual. This patchset first provides the minimal
fix then cleans up the inheritance of types based on functionality.

There is also a rename to TYPE_PXB*_DEV to allow removal of some boilerplate.

Before this series
TYPE_PXB_DEVICE, TYPE_PXB_PCIE_DEVICE and TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE all
had TYPE_PCI_DEVICE as their direct parent though they shared a common
struct PXBDev for their state.  As a result this state contained
some data that was irrelevant for some the types.

This series changes to
TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEV has a parent of TYPE_PXB_PCIE_DEV
TYPE_PXB_PCIE_DEV has a parent of TYPE_PXB_DEV
TYPE_PXB_DEV continues to have a parent of TYPE_PCI_DEVICE.

Each of the TYPE_PXB*_DEV has a state structure adding those elements
to their parent that they need. This also allowed dropping a wrapping
structure for the CXL state as the PXBCXLDev structure already provides
the equivalent grouping.

Patches are similar to those posted in the thread but rebased on v8.0.0.

this conflicts with
     Revert "hw/pxb-cxl: Support passthrough HDM Decoders unless overridden"

I think you acked that one?

We should take one or the other, but not both. If this patchset
is good then it's probably better to fix the bug rather than
revert the feature, I think.

If it's easy to drop the revert that would be my preference.

Yes, the patch has not been picked up yet, so we can simply forget about the revert.

 Thomas





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]