[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] vdpa: send CVQ state load commands in parallel
From: |
Eugenio Perez Martin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] vdpa: send CVQ state load commands in parallel |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:42:31 +0200 |
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:50 PM Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch introduces the vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add() and
> refactors the vhost_vdpa_net_load*(), so that QEMU can
> send CVQ state load commands in parallel.
>
> To be more specific, this patch introduces vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add()
> to add SVQ control commands to SVQ and kick the device,
> but does not poll the device used buffers. QEMU will not
> poll and check the device used buffers in vhost_vdpa_net_load()
> until all CVQ state load commands have been sent to the device.
>
> What's more, in order to avoid buffer overwriting caused by
> using `svq->cvq_cmd_out_buffer` and `svq->status` as the
> buffer for all CVQ state load commands when sending
> CVQ state load commands in parallel, this patch introduces
> `out_cursor` and `in_cursor` in vhost_vdpa_net_load(),
> pointing to the available buffer for in descriptor and
> out descriptor, so that different CVQ state load commands can
> use their unique buffer.
>
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1578
> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/vhost-vdpa.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> index 10804c7200..d1f7113992 100644
> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,44 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_stop(NetClientState *nc)
> vhost_vdpa_net_client_stop(nc);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add() adds SVQ control commands to SVQ,
> + * kicks the device but does not poll the device used buffers.
> + *
> + * Return the length of the device used buffers.
> + */
> +static ssize_t vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add(VhostVDPAState *s,
> + void **out_cursor, size_t out_len,
> + void **in_cursor, size_t in_len)
> +{
> + /* Buffers for the device */
> + const struct iovec out = {
> + .iov_base = *out_cursor,
> + .iov_len = out_len,
> + };
> + const struct iovec in = {
> + .iov_base = *in_cursor,
> + .iov_len = in_len,
> + };
> + VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq = g_ptr_array_index(s->vhost_vdpa.shadow_vqs,
> 0);
> + int r;
> +
> + r = vhost_svq_add(svq, &out, 1, &in, 1, NULL);
> + if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
> + if (unlikely(r == -ENOSPC)) {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: No space on device queue\n",
> + __func__);
> + }
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update the cursor */
> + *out_cursor += out_len;
> + *in_cursor += in_len;
> +
> + return in_len;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add_and_wait() adds SVQ control commands to SVQ,
> * kicks the device and polls the device used buffers.
> @@ -628,69 +666,64 @@ static ssize_t
> vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add_and_wait(VhostVDPAState *s,
> return vhost_svq_poll(svq);
> }
>
> -static ssize_t vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(VhostVDPAState *s, uint8_t class,
> - uint8_t cmd, const void *data,
> - size_t data_size)
> +static ssize_t vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(VhostVDPAState *s,
> + void **out_cursor, uint8_t class, uint8_t
> cmd,
> + const void *data, size_t data_size,
> + void **in_cursor)
> {
> const struct virtio_net_ctrl_hdr ctrl = {
> .class = class,
> .cmd = cmd,
> };
>
> - assert(data_size < vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len() - sizeof(ctrl));
> + assert(sizeof(ctrl) < vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len() -
> + (*out_cursor - s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer));
> + assert(data_size < vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len() - sizeof(ctrl) -
> + (*out_cursor - s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer));
>
> - memcpy(s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer, &ctrl, sizeof(ctrl));
> - memcpy(s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer + sizeof(ctrl), data, data_size);
> + memcpy(*out_cursor, &ctrl, sizeof(ctrl));
> + memcpy(*out_cursor + sizeof(ctrl), data, data_size);
>
> - return vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add_and_wait(s, sizeof(ctrl) + data_size,
> - sizeof(virtio_net_ctrl_ack));
> + return vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_add(s, out_cursor, sizeof(ctrl) + data_size,
> + in_cursor, sizeof(virtio_net_ctrl_ack));
> }
>
> -static int vhost_vdpa_net_load_mac(VhostVDPAState *s, const VirtIONet *n)
> +static ssize_t vhost_vdpa_net_load_mac(VhostVDPAState *s, const VirtIONet *n,
> + void **out_cursor, void **in_cursor)
> {
> uint64_t features = n->parent_obj.guest_features;
> if (features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR)) {
> - ssize_t dev_written = vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(s, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
> -
> VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET,
> - n->mac, sizeof(n->mac));
> - if (unlikely(dev_written < 0)) {
> - return dev_written;
> - }
> -
> - return *s->status != VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> + return vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(s, out_cursor, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
> + VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET,
> + n->mac, sizeof(n->mac), in_cursor);
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int vhost_vdpa_net_load_mq(VhostVDPAState *s,
> - const VirtIONet *n)
> +static ssize_t vhost_vdpa_net_load_mq(VhostVDPAState *s, const VirtIONet *n,
> + void **out_cursor, void **in_cursor)
> {
> struct virtio_net_ctrl_mq mq;
> uint64_t features = n->parent_obj.guest_features;
> - ssize_t dev_written;
>
> if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))) {
> return 0;
> }
>
> - mq.virtqueue_pairs = cpu_to_le16(n->curr_queue_pairs);
So where is mq filled now?
> - dev_written = vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(s, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ,
> - VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET,
> &mq,
> - sizeof(mq));
> - if (unlikely(dev_written < 0)) {
> - return dev_written;
> - }
> -
> - return *s->status != VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> + return vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(s, out_cursor, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ,
> + VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET,
> + &mq, sizeof(mq), in_cursor);
> }
>
> static int vhost_vdpa_net_load(NetClientState *nc)
> {
> VhostVDPAState *s = DO_UPCAST(VhostVDPAState, nc, nc);
> + VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq;
> + void *out_cursor, *in_cursor;
> struct vhost_vdpa *v = &s->vhost_vdpa;
> const VirtIONet *n;
> - int r;
> + ssize_t need_poll_len = 0, r, dev_written;
>
> assert(nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_VDPA);
>
> @@ -699,16 +732,50 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_net_load(NetClientState *nc)
> }
>
> n = VIRTIO_NET(v->dev->vdev);
> - r = vhost_vdpa_net_load_mac(s, n);
> +
Extra newline.
> + need_poll_len = 0;
Maybe we can call it "cmds_in_flight" or something similar? It is not a length.
> + out_cursor = s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer;
> + in_cursor = s->status;
> +
> + r = vhost_vdpa_net_load_mac(s, n, &out_cursor, &in_cursor);
> if (unlikely(r < 0)) {
> - return r;
> + goto load_err;
> + }
> + need_poll_len += r;
> +
> + r = vhost_vdpa_net_load_mq(s, n, &out_cursor, &in_cursor);
> + if (unlikely(r < 0)) {
> + goto load_err;
> + }
> + need_poll_len += r;
> +
> +load_err:
> + /* Poll for all SVQ control commands used buffer from device */
> + svq = g_ptr_array_index(s->vhost_vdpa.shadow_vqs, 0);
> + while (need_poll_len > 0) {
> + /*
> + * We can poll here since we've had BQL from the time we sent the
> + * descriptor. Also, we need to take the answer before SVQ pulls
> + * by itself, when BQL is released
> + */
> + dev_written = vhost_svq_poll(svq);
If vhost_svq_poll returns 0 we must return an error from this code.
Otherwise this will be an infinite loop.
> + need_poll_len -= dev_written;
On the other hand, vhost_svq_poll returns 1 because that is the length
written in the "in" buffer, but it is not obvious here. It is more
clear if we just do need_poll_len-- here.
> }
> - r = vhost_vdpa_net_load_mq(s, n);
> - if (unlikely(r)) {
> +
> + /* If code comes from `load_err` label, then we should return directly */
> + if (unlikely(r < 0)) {
If this function returns a failure we can avoid the sending of the
queued commands, as the caller must cancel the start of the device
anyway. We can return directly from the failure in
vhost_vdpa_net_load_* and avoid the label.
> return r;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + /* Check the used buffer from device */
> + for (virtio_net_ctrl_ack * status = s->status; (void *)status <
> in_cursor;
in_cursor can be a virtio_net_ctrl_ack so we don't need the casting here.
> + ++status) {
> + if (*status != VIRTIO_NET_OK) {
> + ++r;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return r;
Although the caller is fine with >=0, I think we should keep the 0 ==
success. The number of commands delivered does not make a lot of sense
for the callers, just if the call succeeded or not.
Thanks!
> }
>
> static NetClientInfo net_vhost_vdpa_cvq_info = {
> --
> 2.25.1
>