Re: [PATCH] replication: compile out some staff when replication is not configured

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

On 14.04.23 04:24, Zhang, Chen wrote:
> > So, if I want to have an option to disable all COLO modules, do you mean it
> > should be additional --disable-colo option? Or better keep one option --
> > disable-replication (and, maybe just rename to to --disable-colo)?
> I think keep the option --disable-replication is enough.
> Generally speaking, these three modules do not belong to COLO, It has been 
> decoupled at the time of design.
> Instead, COLO is formed when these three modules are used in combination.

But it's not enough to me, I want to have a possibility to not build the 
subsystem I don't need.

--
Best regards,
Vladimir