[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: Legalize MPP value in write_mstatus
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: Legalize MPP value in write_mstatus |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:26:08 +1000 |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:59 PM Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> mstatus.MPP field is a WARL field, so we remain it unchanged if an
Only since version 1.11 of the priv spec and we do still support priv 1.10.
I think it's ok to make this change for all priv versions, as it won't
break any software running 1.10, but it's worth adding a comment or at
least a mention in the commit message.
Alistair
> invalid value is written into it. And after this, RVH shouldn't be
> passed to riscv_cpu_set_mode().
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 5 +----
> target/riscv/csr.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index f88c503cf4..46baf3ab7c 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -659,12 +659,9 @@ void riscv_cpu_set_aia_ireg_rmw_fn(CPURISCVState *env,
> uint32_t priv,
>
> void riscv_cpu_set_mode(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong newpriv)
> {
> - if (newpriv > PRV_M) {
> + if (newpriv > PRV_M || newpriv == PRV_H) {
> g_assert_not_reached();
> }
> - if (newpriv == PRV_H) {
> - newpriv = PRV_U;
> - }
> if (icount_enabled() && newpriv != env->priv) {
> riscv_itrigger_update_priv(env);
> }
> diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> index d522efc0b6..a99026c3e8 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> @@ -1238,6 +1238,18 @@ static bool validate_vm(CPURISCVState *env,
> target_ulong vm)
> return (vm & 0xf) <= satp_mode_max_from_map(cpu->cfg.satp_mode.map);
> }
>
> +static target_ulong legalize_mpp(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong old_mpp,
> + target_ulong val)
> +{
> + target_ulong new_mpp = get_field(val, MSTATUS_MPP);
> + bool mpp_invalid = (new_mpp == PRV_S && !riscv_has_ext(env, RVS)) ||
> + (new_mpp == PRV_U && !riscv_has_ext(env, RVU)) ||
> + (new_mpp == PRV_H);
> +
> + /* Remain field unchanged if new_mpp value is invalid */
> + return mpp_invalid ? set_field(val, MSTATUS_MPP, old_mpp) : val;
> +}
> +
> static RISCVException write_mstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> target_ulong val)
> {
> @@ -1245,6 +1257,8 @@ static RISCVException write_mstatus(CPURISCVState *env,
> int csrno,
> uint64_t mask = 0;
> RISCVMXL xl = riscv_cpu_mxl(env);
>
> + val = legalize_mpp(env, get_field(mstatus, MSTATUS_MPP), val);
> +
> /* flush tlb on mstatus fields that affect VM */
> if ((val ^ mstatus) & (MSTATUS_MXR | MSTATUS_MPP | MSTATUS_MPV |
> MSTATUS_MPRV | MSTATUS_SUM)) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: Legalize MPP value in write_mstatus,
Alistair Francis <=