[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Revert "memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping"
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[PATCH] Revert "memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping" |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:37:31 -0400 |
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This reverts commit 6da24341866fa940fd7d575788a2319514941c77
("memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping").
This change breaks the mps3-an547 board under TCG (and
probably other TCG boards using an IOMMU), which now
assert:
$ ./build/x86/qemu-system-arm --machine mps3-an547 -serial stdio
-kernel /tmp/an547-mwe/build/test.elf
qemu-system-arm: ../../softmmu/memory.c:1903:
memory_region_register_iommu_notifier: Assertion `n->end <=
memory_region_size(mr)' failed.
This is because tcg_register_iommu_notifier() registers
an IOMMU notifier which covers the entire address space,
so the assertion added in this commit is not correct.
For the 8.0 release, just revert this commit as it is
only an optimization.
Fixes: 6da24341866f ("memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
completely untested but Pater asked help in sending this.
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 2 +-
softmmu/memory.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index faade7def8..a62896759c 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -3850,7 +3850,7 @@ static void vtd_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr,
IOMMUNotifier *n)
.domain_id = vtd_get_domain_id(s, &ce, vtd_as->pasid),
};
- vtd_page_walk(s, &ce, n->start, n->end, &info, vtd_as->pasid);
+ vtd_page_walk(s, &ce, 0, ~0ULL, &info, vtd_as->pasid);
}
} else {
trace_vtd_replay_ce_invalid(bus_n, PCI_SLOT(vtd_as->devfn),
diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c
index 5305aca7ca..b1a6cae6f5 100644
--- a/softmmu/memory.c
+++ b/softmmu/memory.c
@@ -1900,7 +1900,6 @@ int memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(MemoryRegion
*mr,
iommu_mr = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION(mr);
assert(n->notifier_flags != IOMMU_NOTIFIER_NONE);
assert(n->start <= n->end);
- assert(n->end <= memory_region_size(mr));
assert(n->iommu_idx >= 0 &&
n->iommu_idx < memory_region_iommu_num_indexes(iommu_mr));
@@ -1924,6 +1923,7 @@ uint64_t
memory_region_iommu_get_min_page_size(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr)
void memory_region_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr, IOMMUNotifier *n)
{
+ MemoryRegion *mr = MEMORY_REGION(iommu_mr);
IOMMUMemoryRegionClass *imrc = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION_GET_CLASS(iommu_mr);
hwaddr addr, granularity;
IOMMUTLBEntry iotlb;
@@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ void memory_region_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion
*iommu_mr, IOMMUNotifier *n)
granularity = memory_region_iommu_get_min_page_size(iommu_mr);
- for (addr = n->start; addr < n->end; addr += granularity) {
+ for (addr = 0; addr < memory_region_size(mr); addr += granularity) {
iotlb = imrc->translate(iommu_mr, addr, IOMMU_NONE, n->iommu_idx);
if (iotlb.perm != IOMMU_NONE) {
n->notify(n, &iotlb);
--
MST
- [PATCH] Revert "memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping",
Michael S. Tsirkin <=