Dear Laurent,
recently we run into an issue with the following error:
command '{ "execute": "device_del", "arguments": { "id": "virtio-diskX" } }' for VM "id"
failed ({ "return": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Device virtio-diskX is already in
the process of unplug"} }).
The issue is reproducible. With a few seconds delay before hot-unplug, hot-unplug just
works fine.
After a few digging, we found that the commit 9323f892b39 may incur the issue.
------------------
failover: fix unplug pending detection
Failover needs to detect the end of the PCI unplug to start migration
after the VFIO card has been unplugged.
To do that, a flag is set in pcie_cap_slot_unplug_request_cb() and reset in
pcie_unplug_device().
But since
17858a169508 ("hw/acpi/ich9: Set ACPI PCI hot-plug as default on Q35")
we have switched to ACPI unplug and these functions are not called anymore
and the flag not set. So failover migration is not able to detect if card
is really unplugged and acts as it's done as soon as it's started. So it
doesn't wait the end of the unplug to start the migration. We don't see any
problem when we test that because ACPI unplug is faster than PCIe native
hotplug and when the migration really starts the unplug operation is
already done.
See c000a9bd06ea ("pci: mark device having guest unplug request pending")
a99c4da9fc2a ("pci: mark devices partially unplugged")
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com
<mailto:lvivier@redhat.com>>
Reviewed-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca <mailto:ani@anisinha.ca>>
Message-Id: <20211118133225.324937-4-lvivier@redhat.com
<mailto:20211118133225.324937-4-lvivier@redhat.com>>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com <mailto:mst@redhat.com>>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com <mailto:mst@redhat.com>>
------------------
The purpose is for detecting the end of the PCI device hot-unplug. However, we feel the
error confusing. How is it possible that a disk "is already in the process of unplug"
during the first hot-unplug attempt? So far as I know, the issue was also encountered by
libvirt, but they simply ignored it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878659
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878659>
Hence, a question is: should we have the line below in
acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_request_cb()?
pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_event = true;
It would be great if you as the author could give us a few hints.
Thank you very much for your reply!
Sincerely,
Yu Zhang @ Compute Platform IONOS
03.04.2013